2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1090-5138(04)00007-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sex differences in mate choice criteria are reflected in folktales from around the world and in historical European literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite obtaining a pattern of results that supported our hypothesis, it is important to point out that the analyses produced relatively small effect sizes. These findings are consistent with the literature that has demonstrated gender differences in preferences for reproductively relevant traits (Buss et al 2001;Gottschall et al 2004;Regan et al 2008). The reproductively relevant traits (e.g., wealth, commitment) suggested by this literature were the same traits that aroused suspicion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite obtaining a pattern of results that supported our hypothesis, it is important to point out that the analyses produced relatively small effect sizes. These findings are consistent with the literature that has demonstrated gender differences in preferences for reproductively relevant traits (Buss et al 2001;Gottschall et al 2004;Regan et al 2008). The reproductively relevant traits (e.g., wealth, commitment) suggested by this literature were the same traits that aroused suspicion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Numerous studies have found that women compared to men prefer mates who are rich in resources (e.g., Buss 1985;Buss et al 1990;Fisman, Iyengar, Kamenica, and Simonson 2006;Goetz 2013;Gottschall, Martin, Quish, and Rea 2004;Iredale, Vugt, and Dunbar 2008;Hudson and Henze 1969;Asendorpf, Penke, and Back 2011;Buss, Shackelford, Kirkpatrick, and Larsen 2001), interested in commitment (e.g., Marlowe 2004;Hamida, Mineka, and Bailey 1998), and interested in child rearing (e.g., Hudson and Henze 1969;Hoyt and Hudson 1981;Buss et al 2001). Alternatively, there are numerous studies have found that men compared to women place greater emphasis on a potential mate's availability for sexual relations (e.g., Regan et al 2008), youthfulness (e.g., Marlowe 2004;Hudson and Henze 1969;Hamida et al 1998), and physical beauty (e.g., Buss 1985Buss , 1994Buss et al 2001).…”
Section: Gender Differences In Mate Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly when reviewing the evidence social status, along with ambition and slightly older age, are indeed qualities that women value in the opposite sex for a potential long-term partner (GOTTSCHALL et al 2003(GOTTSCHALL et al , 2004KHALLAD 2005). This female desire for males with high social status is supported by findings that women show a greater preference than men for earning potential or social status when asked what characteristics they consider important in a mate (BUSS 1989;BUSS and BARNES 1986;TOWNSEND 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…see 5,8,12], sociological and psychological aspects [e.g. see 13,27,34], reflecting the wide-ranging and multidisciplinary interest in them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%