2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting Priorities, Targeting Subsidies among Water, Sanitation, and Preventive Health Interventions in Developing Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
91
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Other research has shown substantial differences among countries in the effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to prevent disease. 17 Such variability between countries, and possibly within countries, makes a single, uniform, global policy particularly difficult. Future research is needed to elucidate circumstances under which sharing is more harmful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Other research has shown substantial differences among countries in the effectiveness of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions to prevent disease. 17 Such variability between countries, and possibly within countries, makes a single, uniform, global policy particularly difficult. Future research is needed to elucidate circumstances under which sharing is more harmful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, such changes could make a large difference. In practical terms, however, identifying and agreeing on affordable sanitation options is almost inevitably a serious challenge, and one that is compounded by the considerable uncertainty surrounding the benefits of sanitation (Whittington, Jeuland, Barker, & Yuen, 2012).…”
Section: The Challenge Of Affordability Versus Acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sanitation programs that depend on collective action by communities may be more effective than government subsidies, but they offer less opportunity for political attribution, and therefore attract less political support (WSP, 2011). Uncertainty about the level of consumer uptake of certain water, sanitation and preventive health interventions (e.g., bed-nets, vaccinations and point-of-use water treatment) makes it difficult to calculate their cost and benefits, reducing their political appeal (Whittington, Jeuland, Barker, & Yuen, 2012). Development agencies sometimes have to guard their funds against diversion High excludability: possibility of excluding some users and targeting services to favor particular individuals or groups.…”
Section: (Iv) Attributabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%