1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00401501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Setting, patient, and doctor effects on drug response in neurotic patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1981
1981

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their frequently more critical orientation toward treatment and frequently more insightful view of their illness and higher discriminating ability are important factors in limiting their placebo response. 3 The similar pattern of response to drug and to placebo reflected in the zero-order correlations between educational level and improvement described above (p < 0.10), as well as our 7 previously cited findings concerning treatment response and verbal ability can probably be accounted for in terms of the same set of attendant influences which apply to the race regressor.…”
Section: Variables Predicting Improvement Irre-clinical Pharmacology supporting
confidence: 53%
“…However, their frequently more critical orientation toward treatment and frequently more insightful view of their illness and higher discriminating ability are important factors in limiting their placebo response. 3 The similar pattern of response to drug and to placebo reflected in the zero-order correlations between educational level and improvement described above (p < 0.10), as well as our 7 previously cited findings concerning treatment response and verbal ability can probably be accounted for in terms of the same set of attendant influences which apply to the race regressor.…”
Section: Variables Predicting Improvement Irre-clinical Pharmacology supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In the comparative literature up through 1979, we found a total of 24 studies (72 comparisons) that involved both drugs and psychotherapy in various combinations. Eighteen of these studies, including 56 specific comparisons, used placebo-plus-psychotherapy combinations (Cell 4) as representative of psychotherapy (Covi, Lipman, Derogatis, Smith, & Pattison, 1974;Cow-den, Zax, & Sproles, 1955;Daneman, 1961;Evangelakis, 1961;Friedman, 1975;Gibbs, Wilkins, & Lauterbach, 1957;Grinspoon, Ewalt, & Shader, 1968;Hesbacher et al, 1970;Hogarty et al, 1973;Lipsedge et al, 1973;Paul, Tobias, & Holly, 1972;Podobnikar, 1971;Rickels et al, 1966;Shader, Grinspoon, Ewalt, & Zahn, 1969;Solyom et al, 1973;Zitrin et al, 1976;Zitrin, Klein, & Woerner, 1980;Gittleman-Klein et al, Note 2). Seven studies, including 16 comparisons, used psychotherapy alone (Cell 7); Brill, Koegler, Epstein, & Forgy, 1964;Gorham, Pokorny, & Moseley, 1964;Karon & Vandenbos, 1970;May & Tuma, 1964;Rush, Beck, Kovacs, & Hollon, 1977;Weissman etal., 1979: Hollon, Bedrosian, & Beck, Note 3).…”
Section: Indirect Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%