Abstract:Summary T lymphocytes, activated by interleukin 2 during an anti-tumour response, release soluble interleukin 2 receptors (slL-2R) into the bloodstream. We analysed the prognostic value of the serum slL-2R level in gastric cancer. Serum concentration of slL-2R in 96 gastric cancer patients and 100 healthy control subjects' was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All survivors were followed for more than 50 months. Serum slL-2R level was considered with respect to prognosis, clinicopathological facto… Show more
“…The multivariate-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs were directly obtained from 20 studies [38,39,40,24,41,13,25,42,20,43,21,44,45,46,47,37,48,49,29,50]. Based on the multivariate-adjusted HRs, the meta-analyses were performed in terms of OS, DSS and DFS.…”
BackgroundCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is commonly used as a serum tumor marker in clinical practice; however, its prognostic value for gastric cancer patients remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value of CEA and investigate CEA as a tumor marker.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE and other databases were searched for potentially eligible studies. Forty-one studies reporting the prognostic effect of pretreatment serum CEA expression in gastric cancer patients were selected. Data on 14651 eligible patients were retrieved for the meta-analysis. Based on the data extracted from the available literature, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for an adverse prognosis were estimated for gastric cancer patients with elevated pretreatment serum levels of CEA (CEA+) relative to patients with normal pretreatment CEA levels (CEA-).ResultsThe CEA+ patients had a significantly poorer prognosis than the CEA- patients in terms of overall survival (OS: HR 1.716, 95% CI 1.594 - 1.848, P< 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS: HR 1.940, 95% CI 1.563 - 2.408, P< 0.001), and disease-free survival (DFS: HR 2.275, 95% CI 1.836 - 2.818, P< 0.001). Publication bias and an influence of different cut-off values were not observed (all P> 0.05). In the pooled analyses of multivariate-adjusted HRs, the results suggested that pretreatment serum CEA may be an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer (OS: HR 1.681, 95% CI 1.425 - 1.982; DSS: HR 1.900, 95% CI 1.441 - 2.505; DFS: HR 2.579, 95% CI 1.935 - 3.436).Conclusion/SignificanceThe meta-analysis based on the available literature supported the association of elevated pretreatment serum CEA levels with a poor prognosis for gastric cancer and a nearly doubled risk of mortality in gastric cancer patients. CEA may be an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients and may aid in determining appropriate treatment which may preferentially benefit the CEA+ patients.
“…The multivariate-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs were directly obtained from 20 studies [38,39,40,24,41,13,25,42,20,43,21,44,45,46,47,37,48,49,29,50]. Based on the multivariate-adjusted HRs, the meta-analyses were performed in terms of OS, DSS and DFS.…”
BackgroundCarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is commonly used as a serum tumor marker in clinical practice; however, its prognostic value for gastric cancer patients remains uncertain. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the prognostic value of CEA and investigate CEA as a tumor marker.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE and other databases were searched for potentially eligible studies. Forty-one studies reporting the prognostic effect of pretreatment serum CEA expression in gastric cancer patients were selected. Data on 14651 eligible patients were retrieved for the meta-analysis. Based on the data extracted from the available literature, the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for an adverse prognosis were estimated for gastric cancer patients with elevated pretreatment serum levels of CEA (CEA+) relative to patients with normal pretreatment CEA levels (CEA-).ResultsThe CEA+ patients had a significantly poorer prognosis than the CEA- patients in terms of overall survival (OS: HR 1.716, 95% CI 1.594 - 1.848, P< 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS: HR 1.940, 95% CI 1.563 - 2.408, P< 0.001), and disease-free survival (DFS: HR 2.275, 95% CI 1.836 - 2.818, P< 0.001). Publication bias and an influence of different cut-off values were not observed (all P> 0.05). In the pooled analyses of multivariate-adjusted HRs, the results suggested that pretreatment serum CEA may be an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer (OS: HR 1.681, 95% CI 1.425 - 1.982; DSS: HR 1.900, 95% CI 1.441 - 2.505; DFS: HR 2.579, 95% CI 1.935 - 3.436).Conclusion/SignificanceThe meta-analysis based on the available literature supported the association of elevated pretreatment serum CEA levels with a poor prognosis for gastric cancer and a nearly doubled risk of mortality in gastric cancer patients. CEA may be an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients and may aid in determining appropriate treatment which may preferentially benefit the CEA+ patients.
“…Serum levels of this peptide have been estimated in many disease entities including malignancies, diseases of autoaggression and inflammation/infectious-based processes, where sIL-2R serum concentration frequently correlated with disease severity (De Rie et al 1996, Itoh et al 1998, Kami et al 2000, Kapp et al 1988, Matsumoto et al 1998, Nakata et al 1998, Niitsu et al 2001, Spadaro et al 2001, Suenaga et al 1998, Tartour et al 2001, Vonderheid et al 1998). Monitoring of sIL-2R serum levels is a useful method for the assessment of disease intensity, efficacy of provided treatment, and for prediction of further illness course.…”
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a recurrent, debilitating suppurative skin disease. The major challenge is the choice of optimal treatment. Assessment of treatment effectiveness is currently associated with clinical observations of disease activity based on Hurley's or Sartorius' grading system. Detailed examination of patients with HS and evaluation of disease severity is frequently time-consuming and undoubtedly subjective. With regard to these factors, there is a need for laboratory findings that will help resolve the problem. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) serum concentration as a marker of HS clinical staging and comparative analysis with the commonly conducted laboratory measurements, including white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The statistical analysis of all these laboratory parameters conducted within a group of 54 individuals with HS revealed that sIL-2R serum level seems to be the most sensitive measurement for evaluation of disease stage. Moreover, the existence of strong dependences between sIL-2R serum concentration and Hurley's HS grading system were demonstrated. In conclusion, we believe that sIL-2R serum level could be used as a valuable marker for disease staging in patients with HS.
“…Similar studies in various solid tumor cases have also shown sIL-2R to be an adverse prognostic feature, especially in patients with nasopharyngeal cancer [34,35], colorectal cancer [36,37], breast cancer [38], ovarian cancer [39][40][41], gastric cancer [42,43], lung cancer [44,45] and leukemia [46,47], respectively. IL-2 has been introduced as a cancer treatment since 1992.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.