Lipids 26, 754-758 (1991) In this paper, the panels of Figure 1 Lipids 27, 436-441 {1992) In this paper, fatty acids were numbered from the methyl terminus rather than starting from the carboxyl group. To translate the n-x terminology used into internationally accepted n nomenclature, the following changes are required:Page 436, sixth line of Introduction section: "Columbinic acid (Cb), 6r162 13t-18:3" should read "5t,9r 12c-18:3.. "Page 436, first line of Abbreviations section: "...9c,13t-18:2. ....... " should read " 5t,9c-18:2. "Page 439, Table 1: "7c-18:1" should read "llc-18:r'; "11c-20:1" should read "9c-20:r'; "9r 13t-18:2" should read "5t,9c-18:2"; "6c,9c-18:2" should read "9~12c-18:2"; "6c,9c,13t-18:3" should read "5t,9c, 12c-18:3"; "3c,6c,9c-18:3" should read "9c,12c, 15c-18:3"; "3r 6r162 12c-18:4" should read "6~9~ 12r 15c-18:4" The fatty acid nomenclature used throughout in the right column on page 439 should be changed accordingly.Page 439, Scheme 1 should be:298 258 218 108
92The Editor-in-Chief wishes to thank Drs. Klaus Vosmann and Kurt Aitzetmiiller, Institute for Chemistry and Physics of Lipids, Mtinster, Germany, for calling these errors to his attention.
Nonessential Fatty Acids in Formula Fat Blends Influence Essential Fatty Acid Metabolism and Composition in Plasma and Organ Lipid Classes in PigletsKatharine M. Wall, Deborah Diersen-Schade and Shefla M. InnisLipids 27, 1024-1031 (1992) The following changes should be made:In Table 1 (p. 1025), the fatty acids listed as "20:0 + 14:0" should be "12:0 + 14:0"; the fatty acid composition of the diet is explained correctly in the text.The second error occurred in the description of the homogenizing buffer used for brain and liver samples (p. 1025). This buffer contained 500 ng/mL leupeptin and 2 ng/mL aprotinen, not 500 mg/mL leupeptin and 2 ~g/mL aprotinen.
Influence of Dietary Egg and Soybean Phospholipids and Triacylglycerols on Human Serum Lipoproteins
Barbara C. O'Brien and Verona Gale AndrewsLipids 28, 7-12 (1993) In