2017
DOI: 10.1080/20008686.2017.1368336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroprevalence and risk factors for peste des petits ruminants and selected differential diagnosis in sheep and goats in Tanzania

Abstract: Introduction: Livestock husbandry is critical for food security and poverty reduction in a low-income country like Tanzania. Infectious disease is one of the major constraints reducing the productivity in this sector. Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) is one of the most important diseases affecting small ruminants, but other infectious diseases may also be present. Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the seroprevalence and risk factors for exposure to PPR, contagious caprine pleuropneumonia … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

7
29
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
7
29
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, there was no statistical difference between males and females. This finding is different from another study done in Tanzania where females were more likely to be seropositive than males (Torsson et al 2017). It is believed that females are used in reproduction hence kept longer in the herd than males, therefore, have a longer risk period for exposure in the herd.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, there was no statistical difference between males and females. This finding is different from another study done in Tanzania where females were more likely to be seropositive than males (Torsson et al 2017). It is believed that females are used in reproduction hence kept longer in the herd than males, therefore, have a longer risk period for exposure in the herd.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…In East Africa, PPR was detected in Kenya and Uganda in 2007, while in Tanzania, it was officially confirmed in 2008 (Kivaria et al 2009;Swai et al 2009). The disease is considered endemic in Tanzanian domestic sheep and goat populations (Torsson et al 2017;Kgotlele et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant difference was observed in sero-prevalence of FMD among mature (23.6%) and young sheep and goats (10.1%). This is in agreement with the results of others [44,45] although the sero-positivity levels in our study were lower. The difference in sero-positivity between age groups may be due to the fact that mature animals may have experienced more exposures to FMD at grazing, watering point and at market than in age group less than one year.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In this study the country sero-prevalence of FMD in SR was found to be 23.3% similar to what has been reported in other countries where FMD is endemic [41,42]. It is however higher than that reported in Ethiopia, Israel, Libya and Sudan [33,34,36,37,43] but about half of what has been reported in Tanzania and Myanmar [39,44,45]. A previous study in cattle in Kenya showed much higher sero-prevalence in cattle at 52.5% [70] and unpublished data obtained at the same time with this current study in Kenyan cattle revealed a sero-prevalence rate of 37.6% in cattle.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Boxplots of variation in PPRV seroprevalence by species and production system at the village level, sub-village level, and household herd level; Figure S3. Standardized force of infection (FOI, year −1 ) estimates at the village level (previous work [19]), sub-village level, and household herd level by species; Figure S4. Spatial variation in the standardized force of infection (FOI, year −1 ) estimates; Figure S5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%