2005 European Microwave Conference 2005
DOI: 10.1109/eumc.2005.1608890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Series-L/parallel-tuned class-E power amplifier analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal operation is also changed to zero-current switching (ZCS), where the current and its derivative goes smoothly to zero before the transistor enters nonconducting phase. Advantages of inverse class E over classical realization are that the drain peak voltages are lower than in classical class E and the inductance values in the output circuitry are smaller, which can save area in a MMIC chip implementation and can usually give smaller electrical series resistance (ESR) [4]. Also, the possibility to accommondate series inductance as a part of resonating circuitry is useful, since the parasitic reactances can cause undamped resonances to drain waveforms [6,7].…”
Section: Class E and Inverse Class E Amplifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The optimal operation is also changed to zero-current switching (ZCS), where the current and its derivative goes smoothly to zero before the transistor enters nonconducting phase. Advantages of inverse class E over classical realization are that the drain peak voltages are lower than in classical class E and the inductance values in the output circuitry are smaller, which can save area in a MMIC chip implementation and can usually give smaller electrical series resistance (ESR) [4]. Also, the possibility to accommondate series inductance as a part of resonating circuitry is useful, since the parasitic reactances can cause undamped resonances to drain waveforms [6,7].…”
Section: Class E and Inverse Class E Amplifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 A)-the inductor gets physically huge. To get reasonable on-chip component values the design was gradually deviated from the design procedure in [4] by shifting it towards lower load resistance and Q value, and increasing the resonance frequency. This ended up in a dimensioning that provides clean, nonoverlapping current and voltage pulses, reasonable size passives, but which is eventually closer to class C-E fundamental load [9] than to original inverse class E. The final component values of the simulation with discrete component models and an off-chip low-pass impedance matching network to 50 X resulted in the following dimensioning: resistive load 4 X; C tot ¼ 30 pF; L p ¼ 0:22 nH; and L so small it could be omitted from the final design.…”
Section: Design Of the Resonatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 was chosen. The values of L, C p , C and L p can be calculated with equations shown in [6]. The value of the inductance L can Table I.…”
Section: B Design Of the Resonatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DC block may be omitted, if it is acceptable to connect DC voltage to the load. Assuming an ideal and very large bypass capacitor C2, the resulting circuit has the same AC waveforms as the circuit of Figure 1, and the same equations for the component values are valid for both circuits [4].…”
Section: Choke-free Inverse Class E Amplifiermentioning
confidence: 99%