2016
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2015.2469293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential Non-Rigid Structure from Motion Using Physical Priors

Abstract: We propose a new approach to simultaneously recover camera pose and 3D shape of non-rigid and potentially extensible surfaces from a monocular image sequence. For this purpose, we make use of the Extended Kalman Filter based Simultaneous Localization And Mapping (EKF-SLAM) formulation, a Bayesian optimization framework traditionally used in mobile robotics for estimating camera pose and reconstructing rigid scenarios. In order to extend the problem to a deformable domain we represent the object's surface mecha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
80
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most approaches have required the use of additional priors using different optimization schemes to include temporal smoothness (Agudo et al 2012b;Bartoli et al 2008;Del Bue et al 2006;Torresani et al 2008;Vicente and Agapito 2012), smooth-time trajectories (Akhter et al 2011;Gotardo and Martinez 2011), inextensibility constraints (Vicente and Agapito 2012), rigid priors (Agudo et al 2016) and spatial smoothness (Garg et al 2013a;Torresani et al 2008). BA has become a popular optimization tool for refining an initial rigid solution (Tomasi and Kanade 1992) optimizing the pose, shape basis and coefficients while incorporating both motion and deformation priors (Bartoli et al 2008;Del Bue et al 2006).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most approaches have required the use of additional priors using different optimization schemes to include temporal smoothness (Agudo et al 2012b;Bartoli et al 2008;Del Bue et al 2006;Torresani et al 2008;Vicente and Agapito 2012), smooth-time trajectories (Akhter et al 2011;Gotardo and Martinez 2011), inextensibility constraints (Vicente and Agapito 2012), rigid priors (Agudo et al 2016) and spatial smoothness (Garg et al 2013a;Torresani et al 2008). BA has become a popular optimization tool for refining an initial rigid solution (Tomasi and Kanade 1992) optimizing the pose, shape basis and coefficients while incorporating both motion and deformation priors (Bartoli et al 2008;Del Bue et al 2006).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While sequential solutions exist for the rigid case (Newcome and Davison 2010;Lim et al 2011), sequential estimation of deformable objects based only on the measurements up to that moment remains a challenging and unsolved problem. There are just a few attempts along this direction (Agudo et al 2016(Agudo et al , 2014a(Agudo et al , 2012Paladini et al 2010;Tao et al 2013). Specifically, Paladini et al (2010) proposed a 3D-implicit low-rank model to encode the time-varying shape, estimating the remaining model parameters by BA over a temporal sliding window.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a similar framework, Tao et al (2013) proposed an incremental principal component analysis to recursively update the low-rank model. Linear elasticity by means of finite element models was introduced into an extended Kalman filter to encode extensible deformations in real time (Agudo et al 2012), even computing the full camera trajectory (Agudo et al 2016). Very recently, (Agudo et al 2014a,b) presented the first approach to reconstruct both sparse and dense 3D shapes in a sequential manner, relying on a linear subspace of basis shapes computed by modal analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The problem becomes even more challenging when input data is corrupted by artifacts such as noise or missing data. Over the past decade, a wide body of research has been proposed to tackle these complex situations [6,22,26,39]. At the core of most these methods, lies the assumption that objects do not arbitrarily change their shapes, and that their deformations can be ruled by low-rank models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%