2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57310-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating the two polarities of the POLO contacts of an 26.1%-efficient IBC solar cell

Abstract: This is because the high conductivity of the poly-Si does not impede a transport limitation. Therefore, a separation of the n-type POLO (nPOLO) and p-type POLO (pPOLO) contact fingers is required [25][26][27][28][29] .In this work we employ a POLO junction scheme that consists of an initially full area intrinsic poly-Si (i poly-Si) layer that is locally doped by ion implantation. From process leanness point of view an attractive option to avoid these pn junctions in the poly-Si is to leave an (i) poly-Si regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of technology, these structures add further challenges to those already mentioned for POLO IBC: the necessity to dope the poly-Si locally or at least single-sidedly, the necessity to contact p+-type poly-Si with high temperature screen-printing without alloying through it, and, for IBC, the necessity to electrically separate the n+-type and p+-type poly-Si regions 66 68 . For the first aspect, we proposed in Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of technology, these structures add further challenges to those already mentioned for POLO IBC: the necessity to dope the poly-Si locally or at least single-sidedly, the necessity to contact p+-type poly-Si with high temperature screen-printing without alloying through it, and, for IBC, the necessity to electrically separate the n+-type and p+-type poly-Si regions 66 68 . For the first aspect, we proposed in Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it could be a fundamental aspect that a certain amount of Al in the paste is required to form a low contact resistance to p+-type (poly-) Si 72 while the Al always yields a certain degradation of the passivation quality, alternative metallization concepts like plating or Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) might become more attractive for structures than they used to be for PERC+ cells. For the third additional challenge (separation of n+-type and p+-type poly-Si for IBC), different approaches can be used: oxidation of the poly-Si between the fingers 73 , introduction of a trench between the fingers 67 , 74 – 77 , or introduction of an initially intrinsic poly-Si region 4 , 66 68 . To summarize, both concepts are likely to require more time for industrial integration than the POLO BJ and IBC concepts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Current–voltage characteristic (IV) curves of the PV given by the experiment 29 and the SQ limit have been shown in Figure 2. The SQ limit is calculated by a thermodynamic model of the PV.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IV curves of the photovoltaic given by the experiment 29 and the Shockley‐Queisser limit [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Experimentally, IBC cells with conversion efficiencies of 26.0% and 26.1% that used POLO or related junctions for both polarities have been demonstrated so far. [9][10][11][12] There are two main pictures of the current transport mechanism through these type of junctions: quantum mechanical tunneling models, as also previously applied for this junction scheme in the bipolar junction transistor community, 13 were successfully used by, for example, Steinkemper et al for the description of an electroncollecting n + type poly-Si/SiO x /c-Si junction with a thin interfacial oxide. 14 Since already the BJT community reports on an inconsistency of the tunnel model with respect to the description of electron collecting/emitting or hole collecting/emitting POLO junctions, 13 Peibst et al proposed an alternative picture, assuming that conduction through the interfacial oxide happens at places where the oxide is broken up locally (Pinholes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%