1993
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.122.2.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection.

Abstract: How can conscious and unconscious influences of memory be measured? In this article, a processdissociation procedure (L. L. Jacoby, 1991) was used to separate automatic (unconscious) and consciously controlled influences within a task. For recall cued with word stems, automatic influences of memory (a) remained invariant across manipulations of attention that substantially reduced conscious recollection and (b) were highly dependent on perceptual similarity from study to test. Comparisons with results obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
824
12
16

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 766 publications
(901 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
48
824
12
16
Order By: Relevance
“…However, little is known about the brain substrates of these alterations. In this study, the PDP (Jacoby, 1991;Jacoby et al, 1993) was applied to a word-pair memory task and administered to mild AD patients and healthy older participants in an fMRI scanner to 26 identify the cerebral substrates of associative controlled aspects of recollection and of item familiarity in AD. Our procedure does not exclude (but did not evaluate) other aspects such as subjective experience and contextual retrieval to be engaged during memory retrieval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, little is known about the brain substrates of these alterations. In this study, the PDP (Jacoby, 1991;Jacoby et al, 1993) was applied to a word-pair memory task and administered to mild AD patients and healthy older participants in an fMRI scanner to 26 identify the cerebral substrates of associative controlled aspects of recollection and of item familiarity in AD. Our procedure does not exclude (but did not evaluate) other aspects such as subjective experience and contextual retrieval to be engaged during memory retrieval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the principles of the PDP (Jacoby, 1991;Jacoby et al, 1993), intact pairs represent the inclusion condition because item familiarity and associative CER lead to the same answer ('old') whereas recombined pairs represent the exclusion condition because item familiarity and CER of the pair lead to different answers ('old' and 'new', respectively). The contribution of pairs' CER and item familiarity processes can be assessed on the basis of the participants' performance in the two conditions.…”
Section: Behavioural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results are consistent with the hypothesis that cross-modal priming depends on recoding processes that require normal verbal production abilities. Alternatively, it has been suggested cross-modal priming may be attributable to the influence of explicit memory processes (e.g., Jacoby, Toth & Yonelinas, 1993;Köhler et al, 1997). If cross-modal explicit memory is impaired in the patient group compared to the control group, such impairment could play a role in the reduced cross-modal priming observed in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The GLM analysis compared the performance of the two diagnostic groups (the between-subjects factor) in the three word categories (the withinsubject factor). We predicted that there would be a dissociation between the results of the priming and those of the free-recall tests (e.g., Jacoby, Toth, & Yonelinas, 1993;Mitchell & Brown, 1988) and did not expect group effects or interactions for the free-recall test.…”
Section: Analysis Of Free-recall Testmentioning
confidence: 97%