Sentimentos partidários e antipetismo: condicionantes e covariantes

Ribeiro, Ednaldo Aparecido; Carreirão, Yan de Souza; Borba, Julian

doi:10.1590/1807-01912016223603

Cited by 42 publications

(30 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…He became the quintessential anti-PT candidate, something the PSDB had masterfully embodied until 2014. Antipetismo has become an important theme in the study of Brazilian elections (Paiva et al 2016;Borges and Vidigal 2016;Ribeiro et al 2016;Samuels and Zucco 2018). The election of 2018 tends to confirm that the PSDB was not the sole and perpetual recipient of this feeling, as Borges and Vidigal point out for the 2014 election (2016).…”

Section: The Conservative Turn In the Brazilian 2018 Electionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Bolsonaro Voter: Issue Positions and Vote Choice in the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections

Rennó

2020

Lat Am Polit Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The 2018 Brazilian elections saw the rise to power of Jair Bolsonaro, yet another conservative politician who won an election in recent years. What were the ideological underpinnings of the Bolsonaro vote? Was his support based exclusively on resentment toward the Workers’ Party? This article uses a unique public opinion dataset, the 2018 Brazilian Electoral Panel Study, to explore how positions on divisive issues related to social, political, and cultural factors influenced vote choice and Bolsonarismo—affection toward Bolsonaro supporters—in the 2018 Brazilian presidential elections. Results indicate that in addition to resentment against the Workers’ Party, a cultural backlash perspective, and strict views on law and order, as well as economic liberalism and rejection of social policies, were the characteristics of support for Bolsonaro.

show abstract

Section: The Conservative Turn In the Brazilian 2018 Electionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Bolsonaro Voter: Issue Positions and Vote Choice in the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections

Rennó

2020

Lat Am Polit Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These results only confirm the strong and consistent electoral impact of voters' attitudes towards the PT, whether positive or, in this case, negative. Petismo (i.e., pro-PT sentiment) and antipetismo are a distinct phenomenon and both are consistent indicators of the electoral behavior of Brazilians (RIBEIRO, CARREIRÃO and BORBA, 2016;SAMUELS, 2008;SAMUELS and ZUCCO, 2018). It was no different in 2018; antipetismo, especially in its intolerant expression, was one of the main predictors of the vote for Bolsonaro.…”

Section: 21mentioning

confidence: 93%

“…In Brazil, the topic of negative partisanship 1 first went under the microscope in the studies carried out by Carreirão and Kinzo (2004) and Carreirão and Barbetta (2004), Carreirão (2008;2007a;2007b), Samuels (2008Samuels ( , 2006, Ribeiro, Carreirão and Borba (2016;2011) and Neves (2012). These studies describe the negative feelings of Brazilians towards political parties as being of no lesser importance than their positive feelings, especially in the structuring of the vote.…”

Section: Antipartisanship and Brazilmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Antipetismo to Generalized Antipartisanship: The Impact of Rejection of Political Parties on the 2018 Vote for Bolsonaro

Fuks

Ribeiro

Borba

2021

Bras. political sci. rev.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article analyzes the effects of antipartisanship in explaining the Bolsonaro vote in the 2018 presidential elections. The expansion of the anti-Workers' Party sentiment known in Portuguese as 'antipetismo' into an antipartisanship that accommodates a wider range of targets and a growing association between antipartisanship and political intolerance provide the context for and underscore the relevance of our tests. Our expectation is that the vote for Bolsonaro was strong related to both antipetismo and negative attitudes towards mainstream political parties, especially when such attitudes were intense. The empirical basis of the present work was data from the Barometer of the Americas (LAPOP), particularly from the 2018/2019 wave. Empirical tests indicate that antipartisanship in its varied forms is a relevant phenomenon and had a major role in defining the electoral choices of 2018, particularly in the vote for Bolsonaro.

show abstract

“…Soon e Kluver (2014) exploram com mais atenção este ponto, explicando que ações comunicativas digitais formam identidades coletivas, entendidas pela percepção antagonista do "nós" contra "eles": " O antipetismo é compreendido na literatura de ciência política como representações de uma identidade política caracterizada por elementos de negação e rejeição do Partido dos Trabalhadores (Ribeiro et al, 2016). Além disso, o antipetismo é explicado pelos estudos de comunicação como a cobertura jornalística sistematicamente orientada contra o PT, pautada por projetos ideológicos antagônicos que confrontam o petismo de raiz socialista e a imprensa liberal (Azevedo, 2009;Biroli e Mantovani, 2014 (Capelas, 2014).…”

Section: Redes Polarizadas Descentralização E Hibridismo De Atoresunclassified

Campanha não oficial – A Rede Antipetista na eleição de 2014

Santos

2016

Fronteiras

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este é um artigo de acesso aberto, licenciado por Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY 4.0), sendo permitidas reprodução, adaptação e distribuição desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados. O argumento é que a internet, mais especificamente as mídias sociais, é uma arena na qual atores nativos destas esferas disputam os espaços da comunicação eleitoral, diversificando o ecossistema político-midiático e engajando-se na campanha. Aplicamos procedimentos metodológicos da análise de redes sociais com a finalidade de mapear os canais que mobilizaram o antipetismo no Facebook. O principal resultado é o que chamamos de Rede Antipetista, um agregado multifacetado de n=532 fan-pages, com 5.954 ligações. Essa rede alcançou mais de 10 milhões de seguidores durante a eleição. Analisamos as características da rede e dos atores que a compõem. Ao final, discutimos as implicações desse achado para a diversificação dos objetos de pesquisa em comunicação político-eleitoral.Palavras-chave: comunicação política, eleição, campanha não oficial, antipetismo, Facebook. ABSTRACTThe majority of the specialized online election literature is dedicated to the official campaign coordinated by the parties and the candidates. This paper offers a different approach, investigating the role of unofficial agents that campaigned against Dilma Rousseff and PT on Facebook. The argument contends that Internet, more specifically, social media tools, is an arena where new agents challenge the electoral communication framings, further complexifying the political and mediatic ecosystem. We applied methodological procedures of social network analysis in order to map the channels that mobilized the "against PT" discourse on Facebook. The main finding is the hereby called "Against PT Net", a set of n=532 fan pages, and 5.954 edges that reached an audience of more than 10 million followers. We discuss further implications of this finding for the diversification of research objects in electoral communication.

show abstract

Sentimentos partidários e antipetismo: condicionantes e covariantes

Cited by 42 publications

References 35 publications

The Bolsonaro Voter: Issue Positions and Vote Choice in the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections

The Bolsonaro Voter: Issue Positions and Vote Choice in the 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections

From Antipetismo to Generalized Antipartisanship: The Impact of Rejection of Political Parties on the 2018 Vote for Bolsonaro

Campanha não oficial – A Rede Antipetista na eleição de 2014

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About