2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2015.08.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity enhancement of surface plasmon resonance biosensor using graphene and air gap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows that inclusion of this air gap layer enhances both the sensitivity (70.90 • /RIU) and the CSF (372.8 RIU −1 ) compared to the case where no such air gap is used (sensitivity of 66.29 • /RIU and CSF of 285.0 RIU −1 ). References [27,28] also used an air gap layer which works as a dielectric medium and increases the resonance dip of the reflectivity curve. Table 3 also shows performances of the proposed sensor compared to the SPR sensor of [27] -both for the cases when air gap layer is present, and no air gap layer is there.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 shows that inclusion of this air gap layer enhances both the sensitivity (70.90 • /RIU) and the CSF (372.8 RIU −1 ) compared to the case where no such air gap is used (sensitivity of 66.29 • /RIU and CSF of 285.0 RIU −1 ). References [27,28] also used an air gap layer which works as a dielectric medium and increases the resonance dip of the reflectivity curve. Table 3 also shows performances of the proposed sensor compared to the SPR sensor of [27] -both for the cases when air gap layer is present, and no air gap layer is there.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [27,28] also used an air gap layer which works as a dielectric medium and increases the resonance dip of the reflectivity curve. Table 3 also shows performances of the proposed sensor compared to the SPR sensor of [27] -both for the cases when air gap layer is present, and no air gap layer is there. The proposed SPR sensor has excellent CSF of 372.8 RIU −1 in comparison with that of [27] which has the CSF of 200.0 RIU −1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first sensing application of SPR technique was reported in 1983 [2], numerous kinds of SPR sensors for physical, chemical, and biochemical sensing have been reported. The earliest SPR sensing devices are prism based [1,[3][4][5], which can realize extremely high resolution of 10 −6 RIU. But its bulky size and mechanical instability make it impossible for remote sensing and highly integrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions are fulfilled using a variety of geometrical and material configurations [6]. Among them, we can mention the use of buffer layers [7][8][9], nanoparticles [10][11][12][13], or by coupling to a grating located at the interface [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%