2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2015.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity analysis with MC simulation for the failure rate evaluation and reliability assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method is verified by MCSM. Compared with some reliability methods, for example, FORM and SORM (Melchers et al., 2003; Saassouh and Lounis, 2012), DIM (Chai et al., 2016), SEAM (Song et al., 2015), FEM and MCSM (Li et al., 2010; Catelani et al., 2015), the proposed method does not depend on the analytical expression of limit-state function, and avoids the difficulties of defining failure domains and computing the multi-dimensional joint probability density function of random responses. It well adapts to multi-random parameters problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed method is verified by MCSM. Compared with some reliability methods, for example, FORM and SORM (Melchers et al., 2003; Saassouh and Lounis, 2012), DIM (Chai et al., 2016), SEAM (Song et al., 2015), FEM and MCSM (Li et al., 2010; Catelani et al., 2015), the proposed method does not depend on the analytical expression of limit-state function, and avoids the difficulties of defining failure domains and computing the multi-dimensional joint probability density function of random responses. It well adapts to multi-random parameters problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-dimensional joint probability density function of random parameters involved are not modeled very well. The MCSM can be used to calculate the responses of structures with many uncertain parameters involved while it contributes most to calculation, even for simple structures (Padmanabhan et al., 2006; Catelani et al., 2015). So, it is not a good idea to use it for complex structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before that, a geophysical survey of the tumulus has been carried out by the DST research group to verify the state of conservation of buried structures and to identify the ancient access of the tomb. Thanks to the collaboration with the DINFO research group, an in-depth statistical analysis of the acquired data was carried out by means of a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation [35,36]. MC method was applied to evaluate the influence of the GPS-error on the definition of the geometric factor and consequently on the indirect measurement of the apparent resistivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical knowledge, expert information and data on the system behavior are used to build the model and estimate its parameters (Aven & Zio, 2011;Aven et al, 2014). The uncertainties in the model and parameters can be propagated by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation (Zio & Pedroni, 2009;Zio & Pedroni, 2012;Zhang et al, 2010;Catelani et al, 2015), Bayesian posterior analysis (Zhang & Mahadevan, 2001) and Fuzzy methodology (Dubais, 2010;Baraldi et al, 2015a;Garg, 2013;Garg, 2014). Most commonly, MC simulation is used, consisting in repeatedly sampling random values of the inputs from probability distributions (Zio, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%