2012
DOI: 10.1166/jamr.2012.1099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Analysis of the Non-Linear Deflection of Non-Straight AFM Micro-Cantilever

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An experimental validation of one beam pull-in to a rigid substrate was carried out in the laboratory and the result show that the model is accurate within 96% [13]. It is expected that the two beam model that used same constitutive formulation would yield similar accuracy range as same assumptions were made in the modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An experimental validation of one beam pull-in to a rigid substrate was carried out in the laboratory and the result show that the model is accurate within 96% [13]. It is expected that the two beam model that used same constitutive formulation would yield similar accuracy range as same assumptions were made in the modeling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a curved AFM beam, a point force at the tip can be considered as illustrated in figure 2 [16]. The moment at any cross section of the beam can be written as: The boundary conditions can be defined as following:…”
Section: Formulation Of the Large Deflection Of The Not-straight Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large deflection of a non-uniform spring-hinged cantilever beam under a follower point force at the tip was formulated and numerically solved [15]. Large deflection of curved beams under a tip load was studied analytically by the Lie symmetry method in [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%