2005
DOI: 10.1108/13522750510592454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitive research topics: netnography revisited

Abstract: Purpose -This paper discusses how netnography can be applied in order to conduct covert research on sensitive research topics. An analysis of a Danish internet message board on cosmetic surgery illustrates suggestions concerning modifications of netnography guidelines. Design/methodology/approach -Owing to the relevance of studying sensitive research topicsin particular when access to informants is difficult -netnography has been applied in an analysis of cross consumer online-communication about cosmetic surg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
306
0
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 446 publications
(330 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
306
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, he suggests the following stages in conducting research: entry into the 'community', data collection, analysis and interpretation as well as member feedback. Although these steps are followed in some studies, for example, in an educational setting (O'Reilly et al 2007), these procedures have been modified by others who have developed arguments for conducting studies without informing users (see Langer and Beckman 2005;Beaven and Laws 2007;Janta et al 2012). It has been argued that the public nature of online fora negates the need to seek informed consent when using them as a source of data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, he suggests the following stages in conducting research: entry into the 'community', data collection, analysis and interpretation as well as member feedback. Although these steps are followed in some studies, for example, in an educational setting (O'Reilly et al 2007), these procedures have been modified by others who have developed arguments for conducting studies without informing users (see Langer and Beckman 2005;Beaven and Laws 2007;Janta et al 2012). It has been argued that the public nature of online fora negates the need to seek informed consent when using them as a source of data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach offers unique advantages compared to traditional interviews or focus groups, including the ability to capture discussions among social media users without a moderator present. As a result, social listening may capture opinions from patients on sensitive topics or from those who might not necessarily choose to participate in a research study [17]. Participants also create communities within social media and network forums that draw patients from many different countries; gathering such a diverse and large group of participants for a focus group or interview-based study would be both logistically challenging and prohibitively expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the early research focused on Web sites using "netnography" or "e-ethnography" (Hine, 2000), which focused on the analysis of Web site content, structure, links and changes over time (Schneider & Foot, 2005). Netnography studies also expanded beyond Web site analysis and explored discussions and interactions in the social Web, particularly in the fields of marketing and consumer behaviour, where access to large corpuses of data have offered in depth and difficult to access insights (Langer & Beckman, 2005;Nelson & Otnes, 2005).…”
Section: Analysis and Use Of Digital Traces In The Information And Comentioning
confidence: 99%