2019
DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2019.1580231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Senior Public Managers’ Organizational Commitment: Do Private Sector Experience and Tenure Make a Difference?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6. This result is not comparable with the results of Andrews, Hansen, and Huxley (2018) because their work operationalizes the ratio of private sector experience to public sector experience and also includes different control variables.…”
Section: Notescontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6. This result is not comparable with the results of Andrews, Hansen, and Huxley (2018) because their work operationalizes the ratio of private sector experience to public sector experience and also includes different control variables.…”
Section: Notescontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…3. A study by Andrews, Hansen, and Huxley (2018) examines organizational commitment across European countries; however, their focus is effects of private sector experience on commitment, not the relationship between bureaucratic structures and commitment. 4.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employees at lower levels might not only perceive a lack of respect and recognition compared to higher-grade employees but also have fewer opportunities for meaningful engagement or influence within the organization. Finally, the increase in organizational commitment with tenure may reflect the development of stronger ties to the organization over time, increased investment in the organization’s goals, or the receipt of greater benefits and recognition for remaining with the organization longer [ 75 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the administrative supervision campaign, the authority of the central government and local governments in environmental governance was reallocated to bridge the conflict of policy goals. Existing literature shows that the most important factors affecting the conflict of policy goals between central and local governments include tenure, education and age of the local major officials (Andrews et al, 2019;Fernandez-Gutierrez & Van de Walle, 2019;Parola et al, 2019;Zhang, 2020). The first factor is the tenure of officials.…”
Section: Further Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%