“…The “remote” heteroepitaxy, as an alternative approach to the direct heteroepitaxy, has been recently reported, where a graphene interlayer partially screens the substrate electrostatic potential, reduces the nucleation rate, and simultaneously promotes the growth of the epilayer. − It is demonstrated that the amount of energetically favorable dislocations for relaxing the lattice strain, which primarily results from a lattice mismatch between the overgrown layer and the host substrate, can be largely reduced thanks to two-dimensional (2D) materials that alleviate the interaction when the graphene-coated substrate was used for epitaxy. , In this regard, epitaxial III–V materials with low-density defects have been successfully grown on top of mono- or bilayer graphene-coated substrates, followed by exfoliation and transfer onto the target substrate to produce high-quality devices. , In such cases, the self-organized in-plane ordering of nanostructures has been found to be important for various functional heterostructures . On the other hand, complex-oxide materials showing extensive functionalities including ferromagnetism, ferroelectricity, and piezoelectricity have also been explored to realize epitaxial growth on graphene-buffered substrates. , For example, Kum et al demonstrated high-quality single-crystalline BaTiO 3 (BTO) and SrTiO 3 (STO) epilayers grown on graphene-coated STO substrates .…”