1985
DOI: 10.1149/1.2114327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self‐Compensation in Rapid Thermal Annealed Silicon‐Implanted Gallium Arsenide

Abstract: This paper describes the regrowth and activation characteristics of Si-implanted GaAs resulting from rapid thermal annealing (RTA) using optical radiation heating. Activation of Si in GaAs by RTA is observed to increase with temperature up to a maximum value, then decrease sharply for additional increases in temperature. The optimum annealing temperature is dependent on both implant dose and annealing time. This activation behavior in RTA time regimes is explained by the competition between kinetic and thermod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation efficiency for the GaAs proximity technique appears to saturate at a maximum activation of 12% after a 10s anneal. The requirement for higher anneal temperatures with increasing dose is consistent with previous RTA and furnace annealing studies of Si + implanted into GaAs (19,20). 3 and 4, however, these conditions exceed the allowable range for GaAs proximity anneals and therefore practical activations will be below 12%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The activation efficiency for the GaAs proximity technique appears to saturate at a maximum activation of 12% after a 10s anneal. The requirement for higher anneal temperatures with increasing dose is consistent with previous RTA and furnace annealing studies of Si + implanted into GaAs (19,20). 3 and 4, however, these conditions exceed the allowable range for GaAs proximity anneals and therefore practical activations will be below 12%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It is generally assumed in literature that amphoteric dopants such as C, Si, Ge, and Sn are limited in activation due to the propensity to exist in both a donor and acceptor configuration and thereby cause self-compensation. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43] MBE experiments are perhaps the most convincing evidence that group IV dopants, and Si in particular, can be used as both a n and p-type dopants. [44][45][46][47][48] It is not clear if p-type doping in MBE growth from species which are nominally n-type via ion implantation or source diffusion remain p-type with subsequent thermal annealing.…”
Section: Ecs Journal Of Solid State Science and Technology 5 (5) Q12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group IV dopants are referred to as 'amphoteric'. It is assumed in literature that amphoteric dopants such as C, Si, Ge, and Sn are limited in activation due to their propensity to exist in both a donor and acceptor configurations, thereby causing selfcompensation 153,154 . Amphoteric compensation may be a downside to the use of group IV dopants in III-V materials, but implanted Si often shows similar or better activation than implanted group VI dopants such as Se when treated to equilibrium thermal processing 155 .…”
Section: (A) (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%