2006 International Interconnect Technology Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/iitc.2006.1648653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self Aligned Barrier Approach: Overview on Process, Module Integration and Interconnect Performance Improvement Challenges

Abstract: Self aligned barriers approaches are widely investigated because they lead to a strong improvement of the Cu/barrier interface adhesion generally considered as the limiting factor for the electromigration performance of Cu interconnects capped with dielectric barriers. In this paper, several ways to perform self aligned barrier integration, using either Cu line surface treatments or selective deposition process on top of Cu lines and their basic performance are detailed. Achieved electrical and reliability per… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, to obtain a long EM lifetime, the improvement of Cu interface is the most effective method by increasing the adhesion between these layers [90]. A typical dielectric capping process consists of two main steps: plasma clean to remove Cu oxides and a Cu barrier dielectric deposition (either SiN or SiCN) [91,92]. Reproduced with permission from Ref.…”
Section: Cu Interface Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to obtain a long EM lifetime, the improvement of Cu interface is the most effective method by increasing the adhesion between these layers [90]. A typical dielectric capping process consists of two main steps: plasma clean to remove Cu oxides and a Cu barrier dielectric deposition (either SiN or SiCN) [91,92]. Reproduced with permission from Ref.…”
Section: Cu Interface Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further reduction in interface diffusion can be achieved by using a metal capping layer (Figure 8.21E-G) rather than a dielectric capping layer [123,128,129,131]. Improvements in electromigration lifetime of over 300 have been reported with a CoWP cap [131].…”
Section: Electromigrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
reduced lifetime for time dependent dielectric breakdown Abstract (TDDB), associated with surface contamination and loss of selectivity [10][11][12][13]. This problem is especially for CMOS Leakage and dielectric breakdown of SiO2 are studied for imager applications, where thick capping layers are required Cu interconnect structures with either stand-alone CoWP or [9].
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%