2013
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective sunscreen application on nevi: frequency and determinants of a wrong sun‐protective behaviour

Abstract: Selective sunscreen application on nevi was more common than expected. It is of concern that this was recommended mostly by physicians. There is a need to educate patients, non-expert clinicians, media and the sunscreen industry on this matter. Tan patients presenting with halo nevi should be questioned about this behaviour in order to avoid false positive diagnoses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 Another possible explanation for the habit of selective application of sunscreen on naevi could be that patients perceive it to be a compromise solution that allows ongoing tanning, despite opposing advice concerning sun protection. 23 In conclusion, public health campaigns should reinforce the message concerning correct application of sunscreen to patients as well as to non-expert physicians.…”
Section: Are Plantar Moles Worrisome?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…26,27 Another possible explanation for the habit of selective application of sunscreen on naevi could be that patients perceive it to be a compromise solution that allows ongoing tanning, despite opposing advice concerning sun protection. 23 In conclusion, public health campaigns should reinforce the message concerning correct application of sunscreen to patients as well as to non-expert physicians.…”
Section: Are Plantar Moles Worrisome?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, more than half of these patients declared that they received this information from a physician (in most cases a dermatologist). 23 One of the causes of this erroneous habit is the incorrect belief of many clinicians and patients that naevi transform into melanoma under the effect of ultraviolet radiation (UVR). There are two important evidence-based arguments against this belief: first, existing evidence suggests that most melanomas arise de novo (on previously 'normal' skin) rather than in association with a pre-existing naevus; 24,25 second, UVR has been shown to affect the normal skin surrounding the naevus much more than the naevus itself.…”
Section: Are Plantar Moles Worrisome?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A reported by Suppa and co-workers [8], sunscreen products are essential in skin cancer prevention, but, despite their growing use, the incidence of skin cancer is still increasing. This has been attributed to the wrong application of the products by the users, or even to the excessive concentration of chemical filters necessary to reach the highest protections (SPF 50-50+).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%