2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(09)60099-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid from water by molecularly-imprinted amino-functionalized silica gel sorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Imprinted and non-imprinted polymer showed similar location and appearance of the major bands. This result is consistent with the previous report [33]. …”
Section: Characterization Of Tem and Ft-ir Spectrasupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Imprinted and non-imprinted polymer showed similar location and appearance of the major bands. This result is consistent with the previous report [33]. …”
Section: Characterization Of Tem and Ft-ir Spectrasupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Based on 3s/s, in which s means the standard deviation of the blank measurements, and s means the slope of calibration curve, the limit of detection (LOD) was attained as low as 0.14 μM. The value is lower than the MCL for 2,4-D in drinking water, i.e., 0.32 μM (70 μg L À 1 ) regulated by the WHO and EPA (Hamilton et al, 2003;Han et al, 2010).…”
Section: Sensitivity and Selectivity Of The Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It belongs to the top10 hit-list of pesticides used all over the world since it has strong endocrine-disrupting activities . The World Health Organization (WHO) and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have regulated 70 μg L À 1 as the maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 2,4-D in drinking water (Hamilton et al, 2003;Han et al, 2010). Considering its healthy and toxicological effects, the recognition and detection of 2,4-D at low concentrations is of great importance and a major challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The α values for the imprinted sorbent with the corresponding non-imprinted sorbent have indicated that there is a significant increase in α for 2-HA through imprinting [34]. For example, the α (2-HA/3-HA) value of the imprinted sorbent (14.59) is 8.3-fold that of the non-imprinted sorbent (1.9).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%