1970
DOI: 10.1056/nejm197009172831205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Gamma-G Globulin Deficiencies in Patients with Recurrent Pyogenic Infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…No long-term sequelae have been identified. Schur et al (1970) first described IgG subclass deficiencies in three adult patients. Since then numerous publications have identified subclass deficiencies in many patients, particularly children.…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No long-term sequelae have been identified. Schur et al (1970) first described IgG subclass deficiencies in three adult patients. Since then numerous publications have identified subclass deficiencies in many patients, particularly children.…”
Section: Prognosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, not all laboratories that can quantify IgG subclasses achieve consistent standards of quality. There is no international standard for IgG subclasses quantitation and inter-laboratory coe¤cients of variation of up to 62% for IgG 4 and up to 32% for IgG 3 have been observed by the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme.…”
Section: Measurement Of Speci C Antibodies To Bacterial Proteins and mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deficiency of IgG2 has been reported in association with Haemophilus influenzae infection (Schur et al 1970), meningococcal infection (Bass et al 1983), the cartilage-hair syndrome (Oxelius 1979), ataxia telangiectasia (Oxelius et al 1982) and children with suspected acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (Church et al 1982) (Siber et al 1980). Recurrences of eczema herpeticum are sometimes seen in children with atopic eczema, but the severity of the recurrences in this patient is atypical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%