Selected indicators for evaluation of eco-innovation projects

Stosic, Biljana; R, Milutinović; Zakić, Nebojša; Zivkovic, Nedeljko

doi:10.1080/13511610.2016.1157682

Cited by 16 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Eco-innovation project management involves a complex set of factors and processes. In this context, the qualitative analysis has been applied for the study of eco-innovation per other authors [113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120] provides insight into project management and allows for theoretical conceptualization in a field that is still growing [121][122][123][124][125][126].…”

Section: Selection Of the Methodological Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…PF_PROFIT-Profitability index = net present value/investment of the project [72] PF_IRR-Internal rate return of the investment project [72,144,146] PF_INV-Level of investment (% project investment/total assets) [12,144] PF_TIME-Time frame of the project [12,144,147] PF_PB-Pay back of the investment [144,146] Environmental Outcomes PE_RRM-Decrease in resources/raw materials obtained through the eco-innovation project [100,110,124,125,128,142,[148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155] PE_RW-Decrease/recovery of waste obtained through the eco-innovation project [64,97,119,124,125,156] PE_EMIS-Reduction in emissions obtained through the eco-innovation project [125,128,142,149,151,152,156,157] PE_REPL-Replacement of materials/resources through the eco-innovation project [64,124,128,153,156,…”

Section: Economic-financial Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Classification and Measurement of the Firms’ Resources and Capabilities Applied to Eco-Innovation Projects from a Resource-Based View Perspective

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interest from academics, policy–makers and practitioners in eco-innovation has increased as it enables the optimization of the use of natural resources improving competitiveness and it provides a conceptual framework for corporate sustainability. In this context, this paper provides an in-depth analysis and a wide classification of the specific indicators for the integrated measurement of eco-innovation projects in business from a resource-based view (RBV). The specific metrics were tested to measure the economic-financial and environmental resources and capabilities applied by five Spanish firms to eco-innovation projects, selected as case studies.

show abstract

Section: Selection Of the Methodological Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Economic-financial Outcomesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Classification and Measurement of the Firms’ Resources and Capabilities Applied to Eco-Innovation Projects from a Resource-Based View Perspective

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(Liberati, Marinucci, & Tanzi, 2015) One of the main important indicators in innovation output is the eco-innovation and regard to common innovation benefits defined through identified criteria to evaluate. (Stosic, Milutinovic, Zakic, & Zivkovic, 2016) 1) Policies: The innovation policies from regional government initiated the innovation without central or regional government's support (Yim, Cho, & Kim, 2015) to shift orientation the regional public and social advantages. (Clark, 2014) To strengthen the efforts of policies is by the innovation evaluation system to raise the innovation motivations.…”

Section: The Main Dimensions That Affect the Stpsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Science and Technology Parks (STPs) Evaluation Model Approach to Eco-Innovation Key Indicator

Yami¹,

Gao²,

Gao³

2018

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Science and Technology Park (STP) is one of the most important innovation policies to develop the regional economy. To manage the STPs successfully, a standard evaluation system as a reference is needed. However, there is no consensus about the definition of successful STPs due to their different goals and regions. Hence, it is necessary to establish a reference framework to evaluate the success of different STPs and it is essential to assess their main goals as the competitive advantage by a set of innovation indicators. This study developed a research model to evaluate the competitiveness of STPs by analyzing the impact of innovation subjective externalities based on the Global Innovation Index (GII) and approach to the eco-innovation key indicator. This STP evaluation model is adopted and tested by two different fuzzy analyzing and examines the survey forms and questionnaires that have been filled by some STP experts and as a case study all the evidence has been gathered and analyzed from “Caohejing Hi-Tech Park” in Shanghai and the results evaluated the competitive advantage via innovation policies and performances and the rating rank contents some innovation main dimensions, key indicators and factors and also the important result as eco-innovation development and diffusion.

show abstract

“…In this regard, the research conducted by European Commission revealed that some 79% of companies that introduced at least one innovation since 2011 experienced increase of their turnover by more than 25% by 2014 [2]. Therefore, innovation gained a status of a key driver and precondition for competitiveness [3,4], moreover, a key element of modern management and everyday culture.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%