2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic analysis of a masonry arch bridge using multiple methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nine ground motions (6 horizontal and 3 vertical) were matched to the determined site-specific design spectrum. Vertical components of the earthquakes were also included simultaneously with horizontal components, as damage mechanism of bridges were reported to be influenced by combined loading [44]. The acceleration-time records of the utilized ground motions in two perpendicular directions, scaled to the mentioned hazard level, are shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Materials Characterization and Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine ground motions (6 horizontal and 3 vertical) were matched to the determined site-specific design spectrum. Vertical components of the earthquakes were also included simultaneously with horizontal components, as damage mechanism of bridges were reported to be influenced by combined loading [44]. The acceleration-time records of the utilized ground motions in two perpendicular directions, scaled to the mentioned hazard level, are shown in Figure 8.…”
Section: Materials Characterization and Seismicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main issues include difficulty in defining an equivalent single degree of freedom system for the masonry bridge, that instead is a widely employed procedure for other classes of buildings [6], the selection of the most appropriate lateral load distribution, and the choice of the control point. For instance, in References [7,8], the seismic capacity of masonry bridges was evaluated by selecting both the top and center of mass as control nodes for the pushover analysis. Nonlinear dynamic analyses are certainly preferred when the aim is to accurately evaluate the seismic performances of the structures accounting for the interaction between the nonlinear damage and plastic mechanisms evolving during the earthquake and their dynamic response [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, although computationally expensive, has recently taken hold to study the complex dynamic behavior of masonry arch bridges, as this represents the most advanced deterministic analysis tool available. Usually, artificial or natural earthquake time histories are selected on the basis of the seismic characteristics of the specific site and its design response spectrum [3,7,10,11]. Moreover, first attempts to apply the Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA) to masonry bridges should be mentioned [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, three-dimensional FEM models [18][19][20] allow both a complete description of the bridge geometry and detailed constitutive models. Regarding the seismic assessment of masonry arch bridges, only a few studies are available today concern the procedure to evaluation of the safety of the bridge [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%