2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2019.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmentation errors and motion artifacts in OCT-A associated with epiretinal membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OCTA image quality tends to be inaccurate in patients with severe retinal degeneration due to ERM [6], and ERM may disrupt the retina's layered structure; hence segmentation errors may exist in FAZ analysis [18]. According to Bontzos et al [20], the iERM period is significantly related to segmentation errors in OCTA. As such, there may be increased measurement errors in the OCTA image immediate to surgery; therefore, in this study, to overcome the inherent limitation of OCTA analysis, OCTA images taken 3 months before surgery, expecting relatively little disruption of the retinal layer, were also analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OCTA image quality tends to be inaccurate in patients with severe retinal degeneration due to ERM [6], and ERM may disrupt the retina's layered structure; hence segmentation errors may exist in FAZ analysis [18]. According to Bontzos et al [20], the iERM period is significantly related to segmentation errors in OCTA. As such, there may be increased measurement errors in the OCTA image immediate to surgery; therefore, in this study, to overcome the inherent limitation of OCTA analysis, OCTA images taken 3 months before surgery, expecting relatively little disruption of the retinal layer, were also analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-quality OCTA images, severe artifacts due to poor fixation, or cases of failed automatic layer segmentation were excluded from analysis. Images were reviewed by two investigators (DB and MD) for segmentation accuracy, as Bontzos et al found a 14-fold increased risk of motion artifact occurrence in the ERM patients, correlated with the disease severity, mostly in interior plexiform and in the ILM layers [9]. High myopic or hyperopic eyes were excluded to avoid bias in the vascular density measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tangential and anteroposterior forces of the ERM typically lead to a thickening of the macular with displacement of the retinal vessels, leading to a decreased size of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and a reduced parafoveal vessel density (VD) [31,32]. However, vessel analyses of retinal substructures especially are quite different among studies, probably due to the error-prone retinal layer segmentation in ERM patients [33]. After ERM-ILM peeling, the parafoveal VD seems to increase, whereas the foveal density decreases due to reorganization and enlargement of the FAZ [17,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%