2019
DOI: 10.1080/19359705.2019.1688746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secure attachment and individual protective factors against internalized homophobia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attachment theory in adults [27] states that the anxious attachment style is based on a negative model of oneself and positive models about others [24], the negative impact of homophobia is known to be higher on men than on women [93,94], and lesbian women tend to be more resilient to homophobic experiences than gay men due to their increased social support [93]; this would suggest that, as an attachment style, anxiety decreases resources for same-sex attracted men to cope with homophobia, resulting in a more intense experience of internalized homophobia compared to women. The positive relationship between anxiety and internalized homophobia confirms the fact that individuals who do not accept their sexual orientation tend to display avoidance or anxiety (insecure attachment styles) [95], whereas the presence of secure attachment has been shown to increase self-esteem and resilience, thus decreasing internalized homophobia [96]. The low weight of internalized homophobia in both the men's and the women's models suggests that, for same-sex attracted individuals with high levels of sexual satisfaction and relationship satisfaction, as well as low levels of anxiety and avoidance, internalized homophobia has little relevance on sexual satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Attachment theory in adults [27] states that the anxious attachment style is based on a negative model of oneself and positive models about others [24], the negative impact of homophobia is known to be higher on men than on women [93,94], and lesbian women tend to be more resilient to homophobic experiences than gay men due to their increased social support [93]; this would suggest that, as an attachment style, anxiety decreases resources for same-sex attracted men to cope with homophobia, resulting in a more intense experience of internalized homophobia compared to women. The positive relationship between anxiety and internalized homophobia confirms the fact that individuals who do not accept their sexual orientation tend to display avoidance or anxiety (insecure attachment styles) [95], whereas the presence of secure attachment has been shown to increase self-esteem and resilience, thus decreasing internalized homophobia [96]. The low weight of internalized homophobia in both the men's and the women's models suggests that, for same-sex attracted individuals with high levels of sexual satisfaction and relationship satisfaction, as well as low levels of anxiety and avoidance, internalized homophobia has little relevance on sexual satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…It is hard to know to what extent conclusions drawn from heterosexual couples can be extrapolated to the development of romantic relationships between nonheteronormative couples. Attachment style has only recently been taken into account in research on the relationships and experiences of individuals and couples of nonheteronormative sexual and gender identities as well as their parents (Elizur & Mintzer, 2003;Fassinger & Mohr, 2003;Fontanesi et al, 2019;Ingoglia et al, 2019;Mcconnachie et al, 2020). In the context of the development of attachment in nonheteronormative relationships, emphasis is put on the importance of socio-cultural circumstances and their psychological consequences-namely, difficulties with self-acceptance, identity crises, sense of guilt, disorientation, loneliness, experimental engagement in heterosexual relationships, and minority stress (Bojarska & Kowalczyk, 2010;Iniewicz, 2012).…”
Section: Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of the development of attachment in nonheteronormative relationships, emphasis is put on the importance of socio-cultural circumstances and their psychological consequences-namely, difficulties with self-acceptance, identity crises, sense of guilt, disorientation, loneliness, experimental engagement in heterosexual relationships, and minority stress (Bojarska & Kowalczyk, 2010;Iniewicz, 2012). At the same time, the authors emphasise the role of nonheteronormative individuals' personal resources as factors protecting them from the consequences of stigma, such as the secure attachment style and the associated self-esteem and psychological resiliency (Ingoglia et al, 2019).…”
Section: Attachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent studies suggest that internalized homonegativity is influenced by romantic attachment ( Jellison and McConnell, 2003 ; Keleher et al, 2010 ; Ingoglia et al, 2019 ; Calvo et al, 2020 ). People with a secure attachment have positive self-other representation, and psychic and relational resources that can promote acceptance of one’s sexual identity and protect them from internalized homonegativity ( Calvo et al, 2020 ; Collins and Levitt, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%