2020
DOI: 10.1109/tste.2019.2927119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-Order Stochastic Dominance Constraints for Risk Management of a Wind Power Producer's Optimal Bidding Strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the extreme scenario in the generated sample set can be ignored for achieving economic PV hosting capacity. To simulate the PV curtailment, we adopt the chance-constrained programming and build a chance-constrained PV hosting capacity assessment model by replacing the deterministic power balance constraints (11) and (12) with the joint chance constraint (18).…”
Section: B Chance-constrained Socp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, the extreme scenario in the generated sample set can be ignored for achieving economic PV hosting capacity. To simulate the PV curtailment, we adopt the chance-constrained programming and build a chance-constrained PV hosting capacity assessment model by replacing the deterministic power balance constraints (11) and (12) with the joint chance constraint (18).…”
Section: B Chance-constrained Socp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where δ is the curtailment probability. The joint chance constraint (18) guarantees that the constraint violation probability is less than a predefined risk level, i.e., the power balance constraints ( 11) and ( 12) will not exceed in (1-δ)´100% scenarios. The risk level δ provides a natural and direct way to reflect the risk preferences of the DNO.…”
Section: B Chance-constrained Socp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the relative stable environment which can be mathematically expressed, the traditional optimization problem can be optimized by many different ways to get the optimal solution. M.K.AlAshery et al established stochastic models to ensure that programming for the risk of the selected objective function distribution does not exceed a certain limit [26]. Bilevel optimization method is usually a good choice when faced with a comprehensive solution of multilevel or multi-party interests [27], [28].…”
Section: Figure 1 Rps and Tgc Mechanisms In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As performed in [7]- [9], the most commonly used risk measure is Conditional Value at Risk (CVAR), which is added to the objective function (expected profit) multiplied by a weighting factor, representing the risk adversity of the WPP. In [10], stochastic dominance constraints are included in optimisation problems to manage the negative tail of profit distribution, which outperforms the CVAR method. Moreover, risk assessment of distribution networks due to adverse weather condition is conducted in [11], where associated warnings are provided as the appropriate storage or trading signals for prosumers with renewable sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%