Second-order factors in personality measurement.

Karson, Samuel; Pool, Kenneth B.

doi:10.1037/h0046599

Cited by 28 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Factor V is similar to that which Karson (1961) and Karson and Pool (1958) have interpreted as &dquo;obsessive-compulsivity-vs.-sociopathic deviance.&dquo; The present study provides no support for this interpretive hypothesis, however-unless one chooses to suppose that convicts should be less given to sociopathic deviance than nonconvicts ; the point biserial correlation between the categories &dquo;in prison-vs.-not in prison&dquo; and Q3a is .22; i.e., the mean for &dquo;controlledexactness&dquo; is significantly higher for the convicts. The independence and G~ variables correlate .004 and .003, respectively, with this sample dichotomy.…”

Section: Interpretation Of Factorsmentioning

confidence: 71%

“…has been factored, either by itself or along with other variables, by Becker (1961), Cattell (1957), Cattell and Scheier (1959), Karson (1961), Karson and Pool (1958), Scheier and Cattell (1958), and others who have not published their results. In these studies two factors-usually the first two in order of variance contribution or size of latent root-appear with only rather minor variations of pattern despite noteworthy differences in the composition of the samples of persons and variables, and despite procedural variations such as those which result from investigators' having different rotational philosophies, using different criteria (on samples of different size) to decide the number of factors to extract or interpret, etc.…”

mentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Second-Order Factors in Questionnaire Data

Horn

1963

Educational and Psychological Measurement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

others who have not published their results. In these studies two factors-usually the first two in order of variance contribution or size of latent root-appear with only rather minor variations of pattern despite noteworthy differences in the composition of the samples of persons and variables, and despite procedural variations such as those which result from investigators' having different rotational philosophies, using different criteria (on samples of different size) to decide the number of factors to extract or interpret, etc. The reliable variance of the 16 P.F. variables is seemingly not exhausted by these first two factors, however. When the 16 P.F. is factored alone, for example, application of tests for determining the &dquo;correct&dquo; number of factors usually indicates more than two factors (e.g., Karson, 1961) ; in studies employing a wider range of variables, the questionnaire variables usually help to define more than two factors (e.g., Cattell & Scheier, 1958). But it has been difficult to regard the factors beyond the first two as replicated in different studies. Samples have not been described in sufficient detail to allow development of hypotheses that would, if verified, explain the differences in factor structure in terms of known relationships between 1 This investigation was carried out during the tenure of a predoctoral fellowship from the National

show abstract

Section: Interpretation Of Factorsmentioning

confidence: 71%

mentioning

confidence: 97%

Second-Order Factors in Questionnaire Data

Horn

1963

Educational and Psychological Measurement

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This identification appears to have such strong theoretical grounds to support it that it is believed that an essentially similar factor pattern will be replicated in future research. This factor also bears some resemblance to a factor previously identified (9) as Latent Homosexuality (Passive) on which I and E loaded heavily. Apparently the alternatives to an Athletic Ego-Ideal are not socially acceptable in our contemporary culture.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 92%

“…4 7 ) . Instead, M is actually a significant contribut,or to the secondorder anxiety factor ( 9 ) which is negatively correlated with extraversion.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…F. test, and t o identify the second-order personality factors found in a sample of physically and mentally healthy U. S. Air Force airmen undergoing recruit training. It was believed that this work with late adolescents would help provide a bridge towards an improved understanding of developmental personality factors in children(4), young adults(2) and adults (9). The sample of 96 basic airmen had a mean age in years of 18.5 and a mean Otis I& of 98.59, S. D. 15.00.…”

Section: Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Second-order personality factors in positive mental health

Karson

1961

J. Clin. Psychol.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PROBLEM Cattell ( 4 ) recently compared the second-order personality factors found in children with those in adults and firm support was again obtained towards the identity and replicability of the two major secondary factors found in the questionnaire realm. I n earlier work Cattell(2) identified four second-order factors based on a large sample of Air Force young men in training and male and female college students. I n an attempt t o replicate these factors in a different sample, Karson and Pool@) identified six second-order factors in a clinical sample of 71 U. S. Air Force flyers. There was substantial agreement with regard to the two major factors which emerged in both of these studies, namely, Anxiety-us.-Dynamic Integration and Extraversion-vs.-Introversion, but none of the remaining factors were successfully replicated. The replication of the two major factors was, however, quite convincing in view of the differences in samples as well as in the actual methodology of the factor analysis.The present study seeks t o clarify the meaning of the primary factors in the 16 p . F. test, and t o identify the second-order personality factors found in a sample of physically and mentally healthy U. S. Air Force airmen undergoing recruit training. It was believed that this work with late adolescents would help provide a bridge towards an improved understanding of developmental personality factors in children(4), young adults(2) and adults (9). The sample of 96 basic airmen had a mean age in years of 18.5 and a mean Otis I& of 98.59, S. D. 15.00. This sample was randomly selected from a large pool of several thousand available basic airmen. It is believed that the sample used in the study was representative of the airmen in training a t Lackland Air Force Base, Texas in 1956 with respect to age, I& and major personality traits. METHODA psychologist-officer administered the Otis Self-Administering Test of Intelligence, Form C and Forms A and B of the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire. He reported excellent cooperation on the part of the airmen as judged by their relative speed and apparent interest in completing the tasks. The tests were scored according to directions given in their respective manuals. The raw scores for Forms A and B were converted into standard scores by using the sample of male college students and high school seniors whose average age is 21 as the standardization group. These sten scores were then intercorrelated using Pearson product moment correlation coefficients t o achieve the matrix of intercorrelations in Table 1.The second-order centroid factor analysis was completed using machine methods for factoring the matrix of inter correlation^.^^ Of the unrotated factor matrix, 'Grateful acknowledgment is expressed to Kenneth B. Pool for his aid in deriving the original test score matrix of intercorrelations. This data was collected while the author was stationed at the School of Aviation Medicine, U. S. A. F. T h i s study would not have been completed without the interest and cooperation of Prof...

show abstract

The sixteen personality factor test in clinical practice

Karson

1959

J. Clin. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Second-order factors in personality measurement.

Cited by 28 publications

References 8 publications

Second-Order Factors in Questionnaire Data

Second-Order Factors in Questionnaire Data

Second-order personality factors in positive mental health

The sixteen personality factor test in clinical practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About