2020
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal herbage accumulation and canopy characteristics of novel and standard brachiariagrasses under N fertilization and irrigation in southeastern Brazil

Abstract: Understanding seasonal changes in herbage accumulation (HA) and canopy characteristics of tropical grasses aids management of forage-livestock systems and optimizes use of novel cultivars in traditional and integrated systems. The objective of this study was to describe and explain seasonal HA and canopy characteristics of three standard brachiariagrass cultivars in southeastern Brazil under conditions of N fertilization and irrigation: 'Basilisk' signalgrass [Brachiaria decumbens (Stapf.); syn. Urochloa decum… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that Zuri produces forage with less stem proportion, which may contribute to greater forage nutritive value (Pedreira et al., 2017), although stems are important components of HA in tropical grasses (Lemaire et al., 2009). The stem elongation may also allow greater light penetration within the canopy, contributing to greater growth rate (Lara et al., 2021), whereas the lesser participation of stems in the herbage mass may contribute to reduced HAR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that Zuri produces forage with less stem proportion, which may contribute to greater forage nutritive value (Pedreira et al., 2017), although stems are important components of HA in tropical grasses (Lemaire et al., 2009). The stem elongation may also allow greater light penetration within the canopy, contributing to greater growth rate (Lara et al., 2021), whereas the lesser participation of stems in the herbage mass may contribute to reduced HAR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This occurred due to greater stem elongation, which contributed to a greater quantity of herbage above the stubble height, and more favorable conditions for dead material decomposition (Herrera et al, 2020). Greater FAR was measured in Capiporã and Xaraés during the warm season due to more erect structure than other grasses, and both presented greater canopy height, forage and leaf accumulation (Lara et al, 2020). Xaraés and Capiporã had greater SHM and FAR above stubble height indicating that these genotypes show greater potential of forage production, and their structure allows better use of the accumulated forage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Adaptation of grasses to environmental conditions may include allocation of photosynthates to stubble and/or belowground mass, and this may affect the regrowth potential and forage accumulation of brachiagrasses (Lara et al., 2020). Brachiariagrasses generally allocate organic reserves to the stem bases and roots (Pedreira et al., 2017; Rodrigues et al., 2007; Silva et al., 2016b), but presence of more leaf in the stubble may reduce the dependence on storage reserves to fuel regrowth (Donaghy & Fulkerson, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regional studies [30,[35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] support the alteration of the default values of some key parameters (i.e., curve number, universal soil loss equation's cover management factor, and plant growth parameters) to adequately represent the study area's conditions (Tables S3-S6). Moreover, a management calendar was developed for eucalyptus plantations according to the productive model most traditionally adopted in the region.…”
Section: Model Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The codes RFLO and PMAN represent two new land use classes added to the SWAT database to represent a condition of managed eucalyptus and pasture use. The parameters altered to represent those conditions were the curve number [45]; universal soil loss equation cover management factor value [44]; maximum and minimum leaf area index [41]; maximum canopy water storage [49]; initial leaf area index [41]; initial dry weight biomass [49] (Table S7). The percent area occupied by each land use type for each scenario is indicated in Table 3.…”
Section: Lulc Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%