2008
DOI: 10.1017/s1041610208007497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for alcohol misuse in elderly primary care patients: a systematic literature review

Abstract: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test is a useful screen for detecting harmful and hazardous drinking in the elderly while the CAGE is valuable when screening for dependence. In the future, the Alcohol-Related Problems Survey, a computer-based screen, may prove to be superior if practical implementation problems can be overcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
49
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The AUDIT-C has good sensitivity and specificity for hazardous and harmful drinking in the elderly. 229 We summarised the AUDIT-C as a continuous variable.…”
Section: Alcohol Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AUDIT-C has good sensitivity and specificity for hazardous and harmful drinking in the elderly. 229 We summarised the AUDIT-C as a continuous variable.…”
Section: Alcohol Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohol consumption is a major risk factor for mortality and morbidity throughout the life span (Berks and McCormick 2008;Rehm et al 2004), and during adolescence it is associated with a range of adverse consequences, including academic problems, future drinking and drugs use, delinquent behaviour (Ellickson et al 2003), motor vehicle crashes (Shope and Bighman 2008), and physical and emotional problems (Tomlinson et al 2004). More specifically, drunkenness has been associated with adverse consequences and health problems such as fatal and non-fatal injuries, blackouts, suicide attempts, unintended pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, academic failure, and violence (Perkins 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por lo tanto, en muestras de pacientes psiquiátricos, un punto de corte de 1 proporciona una sensibilidad alta con suficiente especificidad. Es más, aunque varios estudios han usado un valor de corte de 2 (dos o más respuestas afirmativas) en la CAGE (Berks y McCormick, 2008;Castells y Furlanetto, 2005;Fiellin et al, 2000;Hearne et al, 2002;Mayfield et al, 1974;Paz Filho et al, 2001), varios resultados publicados sugieren que el mejor punto de corte para el cuestionario CAGE con pacientes psiquiátricos es 1 (Agabio et al, 2007;Bradley, Bush, McDonell, Malone, y Fihn, 1998;McGarry y Cyr, 2005;Ogborne, 2000). Respecto de la relación con edad y género, también se ha fijado que el punto de corte para la definición de casos debería ser de una respuesta positiva, dado que este valor puede mejorar la sensibilidad para mujeres y personas mayores (Bradley et al, 1998;Cherpitel, 1995;Jones, Lindsey, Yount, Soltys, y Farani-Enayat, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La literatura apoya el uso de instrumentos de cribado para aumentar la detección temprana de TUA (Barnaby, Drummond, McCloud, Burns, y Omu, 2003;Fiellin, Reid, y O'Connor, 2000). El cuestionario CAGE es breve, sencillo de aplicar, y ampliamente usado como instrumento de cribado para detectar TUA en la población general (Baltieri y de Andrade, 2008;Curran, Gawley, Casey, Gill, y Crumlish, 2009) así como en muestras clínicas (Berks y McCormick, 2008;Fiellin et al, 2000;Lejoyeux et al, 2012;Mitchell, Bird, Rizzo, Hussain, y Meader, 2014) y psiquiátricas (Castells y Furlanetto, 2005;Derks, Vink, Willemsen, van den Brink, y Boomsma, 2014;Etter y Etter, 2004;Kim, Shin, Kim, y Lee, 2016;Lejoyeux et al, 2014;Malet, Schwan, Boussiron, Aublet-Cuvelier, y Llorca, 2005;Oe et al, 2016;Tang et al, 2016). También se ha utilizado para valorar pacientes geriátricos (Draper et al, 2015;León-Muñoz et al, 2015) y en estudios de género (de Oliveira, Kerr-Correa, Lima, Bertolote, y Santos, 2014).…”
unclassified