2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10689-006-0006-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening behavior in women at increased familial risk for breast cancer

Abstract: This multicenter study examined the adherence of high-risk women to screening recommendations for breast and ovarian cancer following consultation at a familial cancer clinic (FCC). Self-report questionnaires assessing recall of screening advice, tests undertaken, risk perception, anxiety (Impact of Events Scale) and demographics were mailed to 396 consecutive eligible women who had attended one of six FCCs a median of 3.6 years prior. Family history, genetic test results and screening recommendations were abs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These percentages are comparable with rates reported by previous studies, which show that between 50 and 89% of women had mammography screening according to age-specific guidelines [8,[22][23][24][25][26]. In contrast, the rate of 45% of high-risk women screening according to guidelines for CBE found in a Of the 8 women with no first-and second-degree relatives with breast cancer, 4 were BRCA1/2 positive and 4 had a family history of ovarian cancer b BRCA1/2 mutation negative (in the setting of a known mutation in the family) women excluded from study c Received personal BRCA1/2 mutation result from clinical testing this study is slightly lower than that reported in previous studies (21-87% of high-risk women) [8,24]. It is possible that lower rates of screening with CBE compared to mammography screening and of recommendations for such screening reflect physicians' beliefs that CBE has lower clinical utility compared to mammographic screening.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These percentages are comparable with rates reported by previous studies, which show that between 50 and 89% of women had mammography screening according to age-specific guidelines [8,[22][23][24][25][26]. In contrast, the rate of 45% of high-risk women screening according to guidelines for CBE found in a Of the 8 women with no first-and second-degree relatives with breast cancer, 4 were BRCA1/2 positive and 4 had a family history of ovarian cancer b BRCA1/2 mutation negative (in the setting of a known mutation in the family) women excluded from study c Received personal BRCA1/2 mutation result from clinical testing this study is slightly lower than that reported in previous studies (21-87% of high-risk women) [8,24]. It is possible that lower rates of screening with CBE compared to mammography screening and of recommendations for such screening reflect physicians' beliefs that CBE has lower clinical utility compared to mammographic screening.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is well documented that adherence to such guidelines is imperfect [2,[7][8][9], with mammogram adherence rates reported to be between 35 and 82% [7,8]. Understanding the barriers and facilitators of screening attendance is critical, if successful interventions to optimize screening practices, and therefore earlier detection and potentially better outcomes of women with a strong family history are to be developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Cohen et al [21], reported that a positive family history in first degree relatives was associated with higher use of mammography. In an Australian study, adherence to mammography screening was found to be 56.5, 66.7 and 91.3% for women with 0, 1 or C2 affected first degree relatives, respectively [26]. Figueiredo et al observed that mammography use was higher amongst women with at least one-first degree relative with breast or ovarian cancer, which they argued was consistent with their observation that these women were more likely to be diagnosed with small cancers, although adjustment for age in their study made the relationship with cancer size not statistically significant [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, studies have found that a family history of breast cancer predicts mammography adherence but may not predict adherence to other screening methods such as clinical breast exam 3,[7][8][9][10] . de Bock et al 11 found that low compliance with mammography recommendations in women with a family history of breast cancer may be related to a lack of confidence in surveillance and failure to remember to do preventive screening activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%