Abstract:Some scientometric studies attempt to explain the factors affecting a country's scientific output, which is usually measured by proxy variables such as the number of articles and citations in internationally-renowned journals. This paper highlights the main drivers for scientific output in economics and business, namely, financing of education and research, population size, the number of scholarly journals and English as the official language. We use multiple OLS regressions and data provided by Web of Knowled… Show more
“…The sharing economy is not very different from other academic fields in geographical terms. Our data confirm the predominance the United States and some Asian countries, just as do studies on different research fields that highlight North America and Asia (in the last decades) as the most popular regions to retrieve information (Chatha et al, 2018;Dragos et al, 2014). This result is also similar to that of Arcidiacono et al (2018) who found an increasing evolution in the number of papers on sharing economy, mainly in an Anglo-American context.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Systematic reviews frequently include a geographic analysis which includes data such as the location of the journals publishing on a specific topic, the region where the data were collected, or an author's country of affiliation (Niñerola et al, 2019). Although the findings vary depending on the topic under research, it is quite frequent that most of the papers considered were written in Anglophone countries, and especially in North America, although the last few decades have seen an increasing number of research studies originating in Asia (Chatha, Butt, Jajja, & Arshad, 2018;Dragos, Dinu, Pop, & Dabija, 2014).…”
The present article seeks to identify the reasons why some articles are more cited than others, with a specific focus on the recent and innovative research area of the sharing economy. To determine how characteristics of the research drive citations, we carry out a systematic analysis of articles published from 2012 to 2018 in high-impact social science journals. Comparative analyses were conducted to visualise what features relate to higher citations. The results show that citations vary depending on the approach, field, unit of analysis, and the data analyses used in the research. Our contributions will be useful both for authors when deciding the type of analysis to undertake and the journal to which to send their papers, as well as for editors setting editorial policy.
“…The sharing economy is not very different from other academic fields in geographical terms. Our data confirm the predominance the United States and some Asian countries, just as do studies on different research fields that highlight North America and Asia (in the last decades) as the most popular regions to retrieve information (Chatha et al, 2018;Dragos et al, 2014). This result is also similar to that of Arcidiacono et al (2018) who found an increasing evolution in the number of papers on sharing economy, mainly in an Anglo-American context.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Systematic reviews frequently include a geographic analysis which includes data such as the location of the journals publishing on a specific topic, the region where the data were collected, or an author's country of affiliation (Niñerola et al, 2019). Although the findings vary depending on the topic under research, it is quite frequent that most of the papers considered were written in Anglophone countries, and especially in North America, although the last few decades have seen an increasing number of research studies originating in Asia (Chatha, Butt, Jajja, & Arshad, 2018;Dragos, Dinu, Pop, & Dabija, 2014).…”
The present article seeks to identify the reasons why some articles are more cited than others, with a specific focus on the recent and innovative research area of the sharing economy. To determine how characteristics of the research drive citations, we carry out a systematic analysis of articles published from 2012 to 2018 in high-impact social science journals. Comparative analyses were conducted to visualise what features relate to higher citations. The results show that citations vary depending on the approach, field, unit of analysis, and the data analyses used in the research. Our contributions will be useful both for authors when deciding the type of analysis to undertake and the journal to which to send their papers, as well as for editors setting editorial policy.
“…In addition, it has also been claimed that the emphasis on social components in the general mainstream of enterprise innovation activity is one of the strongest reasons for its successful functioning and development [11,12]. There is a considerable debate on measuring the efficiency of monetary resource allocation on research and development (RD) [13][14][15]. Table 1 offers an overview of the most important articles on this topic, showing the historic development of the analysis of this problem.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on academic publications have been collected with the help of the Web of Science™ (hereinafter: WoS) system of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI, now part of Thomson Reuters). There are some arguments for using its most important competitor, Scopus, of Reed Elsevier [15,65,66]; however, based on the number of papers and citations, largely independent of the field of science, an extremely high correlation between the "performance" of these two databases has been proven. The rigorous, systematic analysis of academic publications began only a few decades ago [67], but the publication and patent data can offer a longer time series.…”
Section: Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing significance of the "green chemistry" approach [10][11][12] in the pharmaceutical industry is a direct contribution to the decreasing carbon footprint [13], responsible production and consumption, and mitigation of climate change. The introduction of biodegradable materials [14] and other environmentally sustainable packages [15,16] help to preserve lifeforms that exist both below the water and on land. As a summary, it can be stated that the development of the pharmaceutical industry is a key factor to achieve the sustainable development goals of the UN [17].…”
The pharmaceutical sector is a flagship of the economy in most developed countries and is one of the most research-intensive sectors of modern economies. The aim of this paper was to determine the mutual relationships between the research and development (R&D) resources, various indicators of scientific performance and the competitiveness of the sector. We carried out a cointegration analysis of a time series of R+D resources, the number of academic papers published, as well as patents and the competitiveness of this sector in various developed states. The econometric analysis of time series is built on panel cointegration models. Based on the combination of different comprehensive and coherent international databases and applying the latest methods of modern time series analysis, the paper proves that, in most developed countries, a direct, significant, causal, lagged relationship between the monetary resources allocated to R&D and the number of academic papers, as well as the number of patents can be observed. In most cases, a causal relationship can be demonstrated between the number of academic papers and patents, but vice versa, this fact is not provable. This study highlights the complexity of innovation systems in the pharmaceutical sector. The results prove only a weak connection between the number of patents and the number of publications. When evaluating the efficiency of the utilisation of resources allocated to pharmaceutical R+D, the effect of the time lag should be considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.