Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers' instructional practices on student learning

Abstract

Teacher practices are essential for supporting students in scientific inquiry practices, such as the construction of scientific explanations. In this study, we examine what instructional practices teachers engage in when they introduce scientific explanation and whether these practices influence students' ability to construct scientific explanations during a middle school chemistry unit. Thirteen teachers enacted a project-based chemistry unit, How can I make new stuff from old stuff?, with 1197 seventh grade students. We videotaped each teacher's enactment of the focal lesson on scientific explanation and then coded the videotape for four different instructional practices: modeling scientific explanation, making the rationale of scientific explanation explicit, defining scientific explanation, and connecting scientific explanation to everyday explanation. Our results suggest that when teachers introduce scientific explanation, they vary in the practices they engage in as well as the quality of their use of these practices. We also found that teachers' use of instructional practices can influence student learning of scientific explanation and that the effect of these instructional practices depends on the context in terms of what other instructional practices the teacher uses. ß 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 45: 53-78, 2008

‘Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?’ A Study Exploring Students’ Justifications and Decision-Making

“…We are aware that the two teachers in our study applied different instructional practices, and previous studies (i.e. McNeill & Krajcik, 2008) suggest that some instructional practices (i.e. making the rationale of scientific explanation explicit for students) resulted in greater student learning of scientific explanations, some instructional practices (i.e.…”

The Benefits and Limitations of Educative Curriculum Materials

“…Guskey (2002) noted that the change in teacher practices leads to improvement in student learning outcomes. McNeill and Krajcik (2008) specifically stressed the need to track change in teacher practices and how this change influences student learning. Although insufficient on their own, ECMs can promote teacher learning, which may then impact student learning.…”

“…Because teachers are central to student learning (Delen & Krajcik, 2016;Driver et al, 1994;Erduran et al, 2004;Guskey, 2002;McNeill & Krajcik, 2008), curriculum designers need to support teachers when designing curriculum materials. This idea was first discussed by Ball and Cohen (1996), who emphasized the need to understand how teachers enact curriculum by highlighting the importance of (a) what teachers think about their students, (b) teachers' understanding of the learning materials, (c) teachers' adoption of the learning materials, (d) the classroom environment, and (e) outside factors (e.g., policy, community, parents).…”

Química e filosofia: rumo a uma frutífera colaboração

“…Na tabela periódica padrão se encontra os elementos escândio (21), ítrio (39), lantânio (57) e actínio (89). Mas alguns químicos e filósofos da química indicam que esses dois últimos elementos deveriam ser substituídos pelo lutécio (71) e pelo laurêncio (103), já que com eles se forma a tríade "perfeita" de números atômi-cos Y(39), Lu(71) e Lw (103). 64 Esse reposicionamento foi, também, sugerido sobre bases físicas e químicas, 70 tendo sido aplicado em muitos livros didáticos e na ilustração de tabelas periódicas, mesmo que exista certa resistência com tal substituição.…”

“…Sobre as pesquisas feitas com as explicações, 103 entende-se que essa temática confere uma possibilidade para explorar como os estudantes interpretam as ideias e os modelos científicos e como eles constroem relações entre os diferentes conceitos. Para muitos professores de ciências, a habilidade de um estudante gerar esboços de explicações é uma marca da compreensão significativa.…”