2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Science Teachers’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry In Teacher Professional Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many participants had naive views in the dimensions of "questions guide inquiry", "scientific knowledge is justified", and "science is the practice of a scientific community"; unclear views in "scientific inquiry has more than one method" and "data and evidence are not the same"; and informed views in "scientific inquiry has more than one purpose". This result is in agreement with the literature in terms of demonstrating that science teachers and students' views of scientific inquiry are not at a desirable level (Adisendjaja, Rustaman, Redjeki, & Satori, 2017;Anggraeni, Adisendjaja, & Amprasto, 2017;Galano, Alessandro, Luigi, & Italo, 2016;Leblebicioğlu, Çapkınoğlu, Metin, & Schwartz, 2017;Yang, Park, Shin, & Lim, 2017;Şenler, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many participants had naive views in the dimensions of "questions guide inquiry", "scientific knowledge is justified", and "science is the practice of a scientific community"; unclear views in "scientific inquiry has more than one method" and "data and evidence are not the same"; and informed views in "scientific inquiry has more than one purpose". This result is in agreement with the literature in terms of demonstrating that science teachers and students' views of scientific inquiry are not at a desirable level (Adisendjaja, Rustaman, Redjeki, & Satori, 2017;Anggraeni, Adisendjaja, & Amprasto, 2017;Galano, Alessandro, Luigi, & Italo, 2016;Leblebicioğlu, Çapkınoğlu, Metin, & Schwartz, 2017;Yang, Park, Shin, & Lim, 2017;Şenler, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Within the scope of another research, 25 science teachers participated in a month-long program lasting about 30 hours and covering the nature of science and scientific inquiry subjects. It was found that before the program, most of the participant science teachers did not have a good understanding of scientific inquiry, but there was improvement, albeit small, in their views of scientific inquiry after the program (Adisendjaja, Rustaman, Redjeki, & Satori, 2017). In another study that aimed to elicit the scientific inquiry views of high school students in Turkey, the participants had favorable views on the dimensions of "all scientific research starts with a question and does not always test a hypothesis", "there is not a single scientific method that can be followed in all studies", "scientific data and scientific evidence are not the same", and "deductions are made based on the collected data and prior knowledge"; however, their views on "scientists who follow the same procedure may not achieve the same results" and "the inquiry procedure affects the results" were not sufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental issue is the development of the use of scholarly information owned by students to solve problems in everyday life and generate useful scientific resources (Fakhriyah, Masfuah, Roysa, Rusilowati, & Rahayu, 2017). Therefore, it affirms that the investigation is the ultimate goal of science education reform around the world (Adisendjaja, Rustaman, Redjeki, & Satori, 2017). This study examines the understanding of science teachers on skills research to develop their professionalism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In their study comparing the views of Chinese and American science teachers on NOS and NOSI, Wang and Zhao (2016) revealed that Chinese teachers' views on most components of NOSI are at a traditional level, and that American teachers' views are better than Chinese teachers. Adisendjaja, Rustaman, Redjeki and Satori (2017), in their study of science teachers' understanding of scientific inquiry in a professional development program focused on NOS and scientific inquiry, stated that most science teachers had insufficient understanding of scientific inquiry. In their study examining the understanding of science teachers' understanding of NOSI and their use of scientific inquiry in their lesson plans, who participated in a professional development program, Çiğdemoğlu and Köseoğlu (2019) revealed that teachers had insufficient views about scientific inquiry before the program.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%