2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-021-01224-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School Connectedness and STEM Orientation in Adolescent Girls: The Role of Perceived Gender Discrimination and Implicit Gender-Science Stereotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason for the difference in findings may be that although we examined implicit and explicit STEM identity, we did not measure experiences with racial or gender discrimination. Future studies might examine similar research questions about role models and pSTEM identity that additionally consider students’ experiences with gender and racial bias in pSTEM (e.g., Alliman-Brissett & Turner, 2010; Berry et al, 2011; Brown & Leaper, 2010; Leaper & Starr, 2019; Robnett, 2016; Rogers et al, 2021). Furthermore, future studies might examine other factors that promote students’ pSTEM identity and motivation, particularly in the absence of available role models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason for the difference in findings may be that although we examined implicit and explicit STEM identity, we did not measure experiences with racial or gender discrimination. Future studies might examine similar research questions about role models and pSTEM identity that additionally consider students’ experiences with gender and racial bias in pSTEM (e.g., Alliman-Brissett & Turner, 2010; Berry et al, 2011; Brown & Leaper, 2010; Leaper & Starr, 2019; Robnett, 2016; Rogers et al, 2021). Furthermore, future studies might examine other factors that promote students’ pSTEM identity and motivation, particularly in the absence of available role models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theory has been used prolifically in various educational contexts, including STEM (Corneille et al, 2020; Morton, 2020; Morton & Parsons, 2018; Rogers et al, 2021; Tope‐Banjoko et al, 2020). To the authors' knowledge, PVEST has not been applied to the engineering context at an HSI.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, culturally shaped beliefs about innate ability, the history of the field, and gender schemas may dampen girls’ interest in computer science more so than other STEM fields (Cheryan et al 2017; Correll 2004; Huffman, Whetten, and Huffman 2013; Leslie et al 2015; Master et al 2017; Meyer, Cimpian, and Leslie 2015; Moote et al 2020). Taking account of culturally shaped beliefs and social structural processes, a body of scholarship shows that like-minded peer groups, adult support and belongingness facilitate child development of science efficacy and “science-possible selves” (Gauthier et al 2017; Hill et al 2017; Robnett 2016; Robnett and Leaper 2013; Rogers et al 2021). Much less is known about how children develop computer efficacy which is often navigated in the private sphere.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%