2013 IEEE 34th Real-Time Systems Symposium 2013
DOI: 10.1109/rtss.2013.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schedulability Analysis for a Mode Transition in Real-Time Multi-core Systems

Abstract: Abstract-To enable real-time systems to adapt to dynamically changing environments, update functionalities and/or accommodate those tasks migrated from other failed sub-systems, there have been a number of studies on making timing guarantees while accounting for change of parameters and addition/deletion of tasks. While most of them have dealt with "transition" protocols that delay next task releases or discard the unfinished tasks released before the transition, such protocols are not suitable for many contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a baseline schedulability analysis, we take the DA framework for multi-mode tasks proposed in our preliminary conference paper [17]. For all generated task sets with the four-tuple (i.e., 1000 • 4 • 9 • 8 • 9 task sets), we compare the number of schedulable task sets with µ − 1 different transitions M g ⇒ M h (1 ≤ g ≤ h = g + 1 ≤ µ) using their corresponding schedulability analyses 2 :…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a baseline schedulability analysis, we take the DA framework for multi-mode tasks proposed in our preliminary conference paper [17]. For all generated task sets with the four-tuple (i.e., 1000 • 4 • 9 • 8 • 9 task sets), we compare the number of schedulable task sets with µ − 1 different transitions M g ⇒ M h (1 ≤ g ≤ h = g + 1 ≤ µ) using their corresponding schedulability analyses 2 :…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, and then the relative order of tasks in each group is determined randomly (denoted by DA * seq , RTA(C) * seq , and RTA(I) * seq , respectively). Here, DA con is conducted by Theorem 1 in [17], and RTA(C) con and RTA(I) con are conducted by Theorem 1 in Subsection IV-C. Further, DA seq and DA * seq follow the analysis presented in Theorem 2 in [17], and the others are conducted by Theorem 2 in Subsection V-B. We present the simulation results for implicit-deadline tasks scheduled by FP only, as those for implicit-deadline tasks scheduled by EDF (or those for constrained-tasks scheduled by FP or EDF) exhibit a similar trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that the schedulability analysis with core failures can be also studied from the perspective of mode changes (e.g. [20]), whereas the functioning of the system, before and after a core failure, can be perceived as distinctive system modes. Also note that any potentially different workload requirements, before and after a failure, can be analysed with the mixed-criticality computational model (e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%