Abstract. In general computing systems, a job (process/task) may suspend itself whilst it is waiting for some activity to complete, e.g., an accelerator to return data. In real-time systems, such self-suspension can cause substantial performance/schedulability degradation. This observation, first made in 1988, has led to the investigation of the impact of self-suspension on timing predictability, and many relevant results have been published since. Unfortunately, as it has recently come to light, a number of the existing results are flawed. To provide a correct platform on which future research can be built, this paper reviews the state of the art in the design and analysis of scheduling algorithms and schedulability tests for self-suspending tasks in real-time systems. We provide (1) a systematic description of how self-suspending tasks can be handled in both soft and hard real-time systems; (2) an explanation of the existing misconceptions and their potential remedies; (3) an assessment of the influence of such flawed analyses on partitioned multiprocessor fixed-priority scheduling when tasks synchronize access to shared resources; and (4) a discussion of the computational complexity of analyses for different self-suspension task models.

Many real-time systems include tasks that need to suspend their execution in order to externalize some of their operations or to wait for data, events or shared resources. Although commonly encountered in real-world systems, study of their timing analysis is still limited due to the problem complexity. In this paper, we invalidate a claim made in one of the earlier works [1], that led to the common belief that the timing analysis of one self-suspending task interacting with non-self-suspending sporadic tasks is much easier than in the periodic case. This work highlights the complexity of the problem and presents a method to compute the exact worst-case response time (WCRT) of a self-suspending task with one suspension region. However, as the complexity of the analysis might rapidly grow with the number of tasks, we also define an optimization formulationto compute an upper-bound on the WCRT for tasks with multiple suspendion regions. In the experiments, our optimization framework outperforms all previous analysis techniques and oftenfinds the exact WCRT. Abstract-Many real-time systems include tasks that need to suspend their execution in order to externalize some of their operations or to wait for data, events or shared resources. Although commonly encountered in real-world systems, study of their timing analysis is still limited due to the problem complexity. In this paper, we invalidate a claim made in one of the earlier works [1], that led to the common belief that the timing analysis of one self-suspending task interacting with non-self-suspending sporadic tasks is much easier than in the periodic case. This work highlights the complexity of the problem and presents a method to compute the exact worst-case response time (WCRT) of a self-suspending task with one suspension region. However, as the complexity of the analysis might rapidly grow with the number of tasks, we also define an optimization formulation to compute an upper-bound on the WCRT for tasks with multiple suspendion regions. In the experiments, our optimization framework outperforms all previous analysis techniques and often finds the exact WCRT.

No abstract

Abstract-These last years, we have witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of cores available in computational platforms. Concurrently, a new coding paradigm dividing tasks into smaller execution instances called threads, was developed to take advantage of the inherent parallelism of multiprocessor platforms. However, only few methods were proposed to efficiently schedule hard real-time multi-threaded tasks on multiprocessor.In this paper, we propose techniques optimizing the number of processors needed to schedule such sporadic parallel tasks with constrained deadlines. We first define an optimization problem determining, for each thread, an intermediate (artificial) deadline minimizing the number of processors needed to schedule the whole task set. The scheduling algorithm can then schedule threads as if they were independent sequential sporadic tasks. The second contribution is an efficient and nevertheless optimal algorithm that can be executed online to determine the thread's deadlines. Hence, it can be used in dynamic systems were all tasks and their characteristics are not known a priori. We finally prove that our techniques achieve a resource augmentation bound of 2 when the threads are scheduled with algorithms such as U-EDF, PD 2 , LLREF, DP-Wrap, etc.

With the rapid evolution of commercial hardware platforms, in most application domains, the industry has shown a growing interest in integrating and running independently-developed applications of different "criticalities" in the same multicore platform. Such integrated systems are commonly referred to as mixed-criticality systems (MCS). Most of the MCS-related research published in the state-of-the-art cite the safety-related standards associated to each application domain (e.g. aeronautics, space, railway, automotive) to justify their methods and results. However, those standards are not, in most cases, freely available, and do not always clearly and explicitly specify the requirements for mixed-criticality systems. This paper addresses the important challenge of unveiling the relevant information available in some of the safety-related standards, such that the mixed-criticality concept is understood from an industrialist's perspective. Moreover, the paper evaluates the state-of-the-art mixed-criticality real-time scheduling models and algorithms against the safety-related standards and clarifies some misconceptions that are commonly encountered. ABSTRACTWith the rapid evolution of commercial hardware platforms, in most application domains, the industry has shown a growing interest in integrating and running independently-developed applications of different "criticalities" in the same multicore platform. Such integrated systems are commonly referred to as mixed-criticality systems (MCS). Most of the MCS-related research published in the state-of-the-art cite the safety-related standards associated to each application domain (e.g. aeronautics, space, railway, automotive) to justify their methods and results. However, those standards are not, in most cases, freely available, and do not always clearly and explicitly specify the requirements for mixed-criticality systems. This paper addresses the important challenge of unveiling the relevant information available in some of the safety-related standards, such that the mixed-criticality concept is understood from an industrialist's perspective. Moreover, the paper evaluates the stateof-the-art mixed-criticality real-time scheduling models and algorithms against the safety-related standards and clarifies some misconceptions that are commonly encountered.

Abstract-A multiprocessor scheduling algorithm named U-EDF, was presented in [1] for the scheduling of periodic tasks with implicit deadlines. It was claimed that U-EDF is optimal for periodic tasks (i.e., it can meet all deadlines of every schedulable task set) and extensive simulations showed a drastic improvement in the number of task preemptions and migrations in comparison to state-of-the-art optimal algorithms. However, there was no proof of its optimality and U-EDF was not designed to schedule sporadic tasks.In this work, we propose a generalization of U-EDF for the scheduling of sporadic tasks with implicit deadlines, and we prove its optimality. Contrarily to all other existing optimal multiprocessor scheduling algorithms for sporadic tasks, U-EDF is not based on the fairness property. Instead, it extends the main principles of EDF so that it achieves optimality while benefiting from a substantial reduction in the number of preemptions and migrations.

No abstract

No abstract