Abstract:In this paper, we present an asynchronous display method, coined image queue, which allows operators to search through a large amount of data gathered by autonomous robot teams. We discuss and investigate the advantages of an asynchronous display for foraging tasks with emphasis on Urban Search and Rescue. The image queue approach mines video data to present the operator with a relevant and comprehensive view of the environment in order to identify targets of interest such as injured victims. It fills the gap … Show more
“…While it may seem obvious to have autonomous seeking of all detected information objects, it is worth noting that in most realistic applications humans operators are still responsible for determining whether a target of interest is present, especially when the sensor data is complex, e.g., video in a search & rescue mission (H. Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Performance Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, enabling human operators to control robot swarms with hundreds of robots, or more, is still an open problem. Currently, multi-robot approaches generally scale to at most ten's of robots per operator even when using state of the art mapping, path planning, target detection, and coordination algorithms to alleviate the load on the operator (H. Wang et al, 2011;J. Wang & Lewis, 2007).…”
In this paper we present the first study of human-swarm interaction comparing two fundamental types of interaction, coined intermittent and environmental. These types are exemplified by two control methods, selection and beacon control, made available to a human operator to control a foraging swarm of robots. Selection and beacon control differ with respect to their temporal and spatial influence on the swarm and enable an operator to generate different strategies from the basic behaviors of the swarm. Selection control requires an active selection of groups of robots while beacon control exerts an influence on nearby robots within a set range. Both control methods are implemented in a testbed in which operators solve an information foraging problem by utilizing a set of swarm behaviors. The robotic swarm has only local communication and sensing capabilities. The number of robots in the swarm range from 50 to 200. Operator performance for each control method is compared in a series of missions in different environments with no obstacles up to cluttered and structured obstacles. In addition, performance is compared to simple and advanced autonomous swarms. Thirty-two participants were recruited for participation in the study. Autonomous swarm algorithms were tested in repeated simulations. Our results showed that selection control scales better to larger swarms and generally outperforms beacon control. Operators utilized different swarm behaviors with different frequency across control methods, suggesting an adaptation to different strategies induced by choice of control method. Simple autonomous swarms outperformed human operators in open environments, but operators adapted better to complex environments with obstacles. Human controlled swarms fell short of task-specific benchmarks under all conditions. Our results reinforce the importance of understanding and choosing appropriate types of human-swarm interaction when designing swarm systems, in addition to choosing appropriate swarm behaviors.
“…While it may seem obvious to have autonomous seeking of all detected information objects, it is worth noting that in most realistic applications humans operators are still responsible for determining whether a target of interest is present, especially when the sensor data is complex, e.g., video in a search & rescue mission (H. Wang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Performance Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In short, enabling human operators to control robot swarms with hundreds of robots, or more, is still an open problem. Currently, multi-robot approaches generally scale to at most ten's of robots per operator even when using state of the art mapping, path planning, target detection, and coordination algorithms to alleviate the load on the operator (H. Wang et al, 2011;J. Wang & Lewis, 2007).…”
In this paper we present the first study of human-swarm interaction comparing two fundamental types of interaction, coined intermittent and environmental. These types are exemplified by two control methods, selection and beacon control, made available to a human operator to control a foraging swarm of robots. Selection and beacon control differ with respect to their temporal and spatial influence on the swarm and enable an operator to generate different strategies from the basic behaviors of the swarm. Selection control requires an active selection of groups of robots while beacon control exerts an influence on nearby robots within a set range. Both control methods are implemented in a testbed in which operators solve an information foraging problem by utilizing a set of swarm behaviors. The robotic swarm has only local communication and sensing capabilities. The number of robots in the swarm range from 50 to 200. Operator performance for each control method is compared in a series of missions in different environments with no obstacles up to cluttered and structured obstacles. In addition, performance is compared to simple and advanced autonomous swarms. Thirty-two participants were recruited for participation in the study. Autonomous swarm algorithms were tested in repeated simulations. Our results showed that selection control scales better to larger swarms and generally outperforms beacon control. Operators utilized different swarm behaviors with different frequency across control methods, suggesting an adaptation to different strategies induced by choice of control method. Simple autonomous swarms outperformed human operators in open environments, but operators adapted better to complex environments with obstacles. Human controlled swarms fell short of task-specific benchmarks under all conditions. Our results reinforce the importance of understanding and choosing appropriate types of human-swarm interaction when designing swarm systems, in addition to choosing appropriate swarm behaviors.
“…There is a growing interest in human operator interfaces for robotic exploration and search in unknown areas [6], [9], [7]. Human operators play a key role in such missions, as the interpretation of camera images typically requires the visual perception skills of humans [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has several advantages. First, it allows scaling up the number of robots with only a moderate increase to the operator's workload, since the operator no longer has to observe live video feeds from multiple robots [7]. It also overcomes communication constraints that often limit the ability to stream live video from the robots.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A leading approach automates this process, and automatically selects images for viewing, based on a utility value, which is computed by the image area that was not already seen [7]. Users can then view images according to that order, and navigate through images that were recorded near the selected image.…”
Abstract-Human operators play a key role in robotic exploration and search missions, as the interpretation of camera images typically requires the visual perception skills of humans. Thus one the key challenges in building effective robotic systems for such missions lies in developing good operator interfaces. In this paper, we present a novel asynchronous user-guided interface for human operators of robotic search of an unknown area. Enabled by efficient methods to store and retrieve recorded images (and meta information) in realtime, our interface allows the operator to click on any point of interest. The operator is then presented with highly-relevant images that cover the point, without occlusion. This, in contrast with system-guided approaches, where an automated system selects areas and images for inspection. Experiments with 32 human subjects in two different-size maps favor the user-guided approach we present over the system-guided approach. Additional experiments with human subjects provide an explanation as to the environment characteristics that favor our approach.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.