2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00121-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
1,899
3
45

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,336 publications
(2,113 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
14
1,899
3
45
Order By: Relevance
“…The Young modulus of the titanium lattice varies gradually from 2.7 GPa to 6.6 GPa, which is also in the range of the transitions from trabecular to cortical bone, which the lattice would aim to replace or repair. In consequence, according to our results, the mechanical performance of the construct is bio mimetic, as proposed in seminal papers in the field [51], and the stiffness values of the bony and chondral phases can be tuned to the desired applications, by means of controlled modifications of the computer aided designs, of the materials used, of the rate of porogen employed, among other options that promote the versatility of the proposed approach. The design parameters used for these first prototypes provide results in the expected ranges of mechanical proper ties of the biomaterials to be repaired or replaced.…”
Section: Cell Culture Process For In Vitro Validationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The Young modulus of the titanium lattice varies gradually from 2.7 GPa to 6.6 GPa, which is also in the range of the transitions from trabecular to cortical bone, which the lattice would aim to replace or repair. In consequence, according to our results, the mechanical performance of the construct is bio mimetic, as proposed in seminal papers in the field [51], and the stiffness values of the bony and chondral phases can be tuned to the desired applications, by means of controlled modifications of the computer aided designs, of the materials used, of the rate of porogen employed, among other options that promote the versatility of the proposed approach. The design parameters used for these first prototypes provide results in the expected ranges of mechanical proper ties of the biomaterials to be repaired or replaced.…”
Section: Cell Culture Process For In Vitro Validationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Since the thickness and microstructure of the Bioglass® coating will influence the degradation behaviour of the composite material, an even, uniform and reproducible coating along the walls of pores is required. Moreover, for cell proliferation, tissue engineering scaffolds are required to possess sufficient pore volume, as well as pores of a given, controlled size [31]. In the interior of the composite foams fabricated by EPD, however, the original interconnected porous structure of the foam became "sealed" by the Bioglass® particles, and therefore, this technique was found to be inadequate for the purpose of fabricating porous composite scaffolds, at least for the conditions investigated here.…”
Section: Materials Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scaffold should be designed to offer an adequate biomechanical environment for cells and newly formed tissue. One of the main objectives when designing a scaffold is to obtain a structure that diminishes the differences in its stressstrain response with respect to the neighboring tissue at the site of the defect [2]. At the same time, the scaffold must transmit appropriate mechanical signals to the cells, which then translate mechanical stimuli to stimulate extra-cellular matrix production [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%