2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Composite scaffolds for osteochondral repair obtained by combination of additive manufacturing, leaching processes and hMSC-CM functionalization

Abstract: A b s t r a c tArticular repair is a relevant and challenging area for the emerging fields of tissue engineering and biofabrication. The need of significant gradients of properties, for the promotion of osteochondral repair, has led to the develop ment of several families of composite biomaterials and scaffolds, using different effective approaches, although a perfect solution has not yet been found. In this study we present the design, modeling, rapid manufacturing and in vitro testing of a composite scaffold… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The composite scaffolds were individually placed in 25 mL Falcon culture tubes(see Figure 3 ) and successively treated with 2 mL of (i) 95% ethanol, for a duration of 30 min and two times, to dissociate the bundle of carbon fibers into parallel carbon fibrils, with an average cross section of 4μm, by removing the holding resin used during fabric texturing; (ii) PBS wash; (iii) 2M HCl attack for 24 h for the acid activation of surfaces; (iv) PBS wash until neutralization; (v) surface coating CM-hMSCs for 24 h in cell incubator; (vi) removal of hMSC-CM and 10 5 hMSCs seeding drop by drop. After 30 min in a cell incubator, the composite niches were exposed to a growth medium of DMEM-LG–10%FBS and to a chondrogenic differentiation medium, with composition described in [ 23 , 24 ], for a duration of seven days, changing the media twice a day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composite scaffolds were individually placed in 25 mL Falcon culture tubes(see Figure 3 ) and successively treated with 2 mL of (i) 95% ethanol, for a duration of 30 min and two times, to dissociate the bundle of carbon fibers into parallel carbon fibrils, with an average cross section of 4μm, by removing the holding resin used during fabric texturing; (ii) PBS wash; (iii) 2M HCl attack for 24 h for the acid activation of surfaces; (iv) PBS wash until neutralization; (v) surface coating CM-hMSCs for 24 h in cell incubator; (vi) removal of hMSC-CM and 10 5 hMSCs seeding drop by drop. After 30 min in a cell incubator, the composite niches were exposed to a growth medium of DMEM-LG–10%FBS and to a chondrogenic differentiation medium, with composition described in [ 23 , 24 ], for a duration of seven days, changing the media twice a day.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the conditioned medium is prepared, the multi-organ-on-chip biomedical microdevice is sterilized, washed and surface coated with the CM-hMSCs during 24 h in cell incubator, which is removed, just before seeding the microsystem with 10 3 hMSCs drop by drop and using the six chamber inlets of the micro-injected polymeric replica used for the validation. Summarizing, the process follows previous research with some slight modifications [23,24]. The results from cell motility and colonization of the microsystems were determined by staining with crystal violet and by optical microscopy and are discussed in the following section.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, manifold metal–polymer and ceramic‐polymer composites have been employed to restore osteochondral lesions. Although these composites can bring together the stiffness of metals or ceramics for the osseous phase and the viscoelasticity of polymers for the cartilaginous part (Lantada, Iniesta, & García‐Ruiz, ), they still confront some shortcomings. First and foremost, the scaffolds did not completely imitate the native matrix of osteochondral tissues as they match mechanically but not architecturally and functionally with osteochondral interfaces.…”
Section: Osteochondral Tissue Regenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%