2004
DOI: 10.1039/b410643a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saturation effects in TXRF on micro-droplet residue samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(27 reference statements)
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 [40,41]. The saturation effect is explained quantitatively by the phenomenon of mass-absorption of the primary X-ray beam in the residue, as demonstrated in a recent modeling study [41]. The saturation effect is found to be depending on both sample characteristics, such as the density and the residue dimensions, and analysis settings such as the excitation energy.…”
Section: Vpd-dc-txrf Accuracymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 [40,41]. The saturation effect is explained quantitatively by the phenomenon of mass-absorption of the primary X-ray beam in the residue, as demonstrated in a recent modeling study [41]. The saturation effect is found to be depending on both sample characteristics, such as the density and the residue dimensions, and analysis settings such as the excitation energy.…”
Section: Vpd-dc-txrf Accuracymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…3-10 ng), as illustrated in Fig. 8 [40,41]. The saturation effect is explained quantitatively by the phenomenon of mass-absorption of the primary X-ray beam in the residue, as demonstrated in a recent modeling study [41].…”
Section: Vpd-dc-txrf Accuracymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous experiments with 20 nL droplet size showed a linearity of TXRF signal response up to 20 ng total Ni in the array [20], which was an improvement in the linearity range over previously reported dried residues measured by TXRF [10,11]. The linearity range of the picoliter droplet arrays was studied by jetting a pattern of 88 × 87 depositions of 9 pL droplets, for a total of 7656 droplets in each array.…”
Section: Txrf Signal Response To the Depositionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This level of automation, while possible with VPD-ICP-MS, is more difficult to achieve and thus it is usually regarded as a laboratory analysis. Even though automated VPD-TXRF systems are widely accepted in the semiconductor industry [7][8][9] there are areas for improvement such as expanding the linear dynamic range and controlling the morphology of the dried residue as that impacts the analytical signal [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The morphology has critical influence on effects like absorption of the fluorescence photons of the primary beam and therefore on the accuracy of the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%