“…8 [40,41]. The saturation effect is explained quantitatively by the phenomenon of mass-absorption of the primary X-ray beam in the residue, as demonstrated in a recent modeling study [41]. The saturation effect is found to be depending on both sample characteristics, such as the density and the residue dimensions, and analysis settings such as the excitation energy.…”
Section: Vpd-dc-txrf Accuracymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…3-10 ng), as illustrated in Fig. 8 [40,41]. The saturation effect is explained quantitatively by the phenomenon of mass-absorption of the primary X-ray beam in the residue, as demonstrated in a recent modeling study [41].…”
Section: Vpd-dc-txrf Accuracymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…7a) [12,75]. -The low linear range of TXRF on the micro-droplet samples, limited to less than four orders of magnitude: The upper limits of the range are determined by the effects of massabsorption of primary X-rays in the residue, as demonstrated very recently [41]. As the droplet drying process inherently leads to compact ring-shaped residues with rather high metal densities, mass-absorption effects start to be significantly (underestimations >10%) already above low metal contents of about 3 × 10 13 -1 × 10 14 Ni atoms depending on the excitation source (i.e.…”
Section: Calibration Using a Micro-droplet Residue Standard Samplementioning
“…8 [40,41]. The saturation effect is explained quantitatively by the phenomenon of mass-absorption of the primary X-ray beam in the residue, as demonstrated in a recent modeling study [41]. The saturation effect is found to be depending on both sample characteristics, such as the density and the residue dimensions, and analysis settings such as the excitation energy.…”
Section: Vpd-dc-txrf Accuracymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…3-10 ng), as illustrated in Fig. 8 [40,41]. The saturation effect is explained quantitatively by the phenomenon of mass-absorption of the primary X-ray beam in the residue, as demonstrated in a recent modeling study [41].…”
Section: Vpd-dc-txrf Accuracymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…7a) [12,75]. -The low linear range of TXRF on the micro-droplet samples, limited to less than four orders of magnitude: The upper limits of the range are determined by the effects of massabsorption of primary X-rays in the residue, as demonstrated very recently [41]. As the droplet drying process inherently leads to compact ring-shaped residues with rather high metal densities, mass-absorption effects start to be significantly (underestimations >10%) already above low metal contents of about 3 × 10 13 -1 × 10 14 Ni atoms depending on the excitation source (i.e.…”
Section: Calibration Using a Micro-droplet Residue Standard Samplementioning
“…Previous experiments with 20 nL droplet size showed a linearity of TXRF signal response up to 20 ng total Ni in the array [20], which was an improvement in the linearity range over previously reported dried residues measured by TXRF [10,11]. The linearity range of the picoliter droplet arrays was studied by jetting a pattern of 88 × 87 depositions of 9 pL droplets, for a total of 7656 droplets in each array.…”
Section: Txrf Signal Response To the Depositionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This level of automation, while possible with VPD-ICP-MS, is more difficult to achieve and thus it is usually regarded as a laboratory analysis. Even though automated VPD-TXRF systems are widely accepted in the semiconductor industry [7][8][9] there are areas for improvement such as expanding the linear dynamic range and controlling the morphology of the dried residue as that impacts the analytical signal [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The morphology has critical influence on effects like absorption of the fluorescence photons of the primary beam and therefore on the accuracy of the analysis.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.