Satisfiability Judgement under Incomplete Information

Gomolińska, Anna

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11479-3_5

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 85 publications

(127 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Such a form of rule applicability, called rough applicability, is based on various kinds of rough satisfiability of sets of rule premises, where granulation of information plays an important role. Gomolinska (2010) has presented the rough granular view on the problem of satisfiability of formulas (defining some conditions) by objects under incomplete information about the objects and the situation. Judgement of formula satisfiability is important, e.g., when making the decision whether or not to apply a rule to an object.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Linking Group Theory to Social Science Game Theory: Interaction Grammars, Group Subcultures and Games for Comparative Analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article draws on earlier work in social system theorizing and analysis-in particular, the theory of social rule systems. On the basis of this foundational work, its aim is to systematically link theories of social groups and organizations, on the one hand, and social science game and interaction theory, on the other hand. Rule system theory has contributed to significant features of group theory and social science game theory. It is a cultural-institutional approach to conceptualizing group systems and games. We explore how groups and their particular games can be effectively described, analyzed, and compared-and their similarities and differences identified on a systematic basis. For illustrative purposes, we present a selection of several ideal types of groups: a military unit, a terrorist group, a recreational or social group, a research group, and a business entity, each of whom has a distinct rule configuration making for particular "rules of the game" and game patterns of interaction and outcome.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Linking Group Theory to Social Science Game Theory: Interaction Grammars, Group Subcultures and Games for Comparative Analysis

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In AI, specification of speech acts is closely related to dynamical character of systems in which dialogues are performed. Thereby, participants of dialogues decide which speech acts use based on reasoning about changes, often under incomplete information (see Skowron et al 2012, Gomolinska 2010 for rough set and Kacprzak et al 2013 for fuzzy view on this problem).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies

Kacprzak

Yaskorska

2014

Argumentation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a dialogue system called Lorenzen-Hamblin Natural Dialogue (LHND), in which participants can commit formal fallacies and have a method of both identifying and withdrawing formal fallacies. It therefore provides a tool for the dialectical evaluation of force of argument when players advance reasons which are deductively incorrect. The system is inspired by Hamblin's formal dialectic and Lorenzen's dialogical logic. It offers uniform protocols for Hamblin's and Lorenzen's dialogues and adds a protocol for embedding them. This unification required a reformulation of the original description of Lorenzen's system to distinguish ''between different stances that a person might take in the discussion'', as suggested by Hodges. The LHND system is compared to Walton and Krabbe's Complex Persuasion Dialogue using an example of a dialogue.

show abstract