2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-014-9324-4
View full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: This paper presents a dialogue system called Lorenzen-Hamblin Natural Dialogue (LHND), in which participants can commit formal fallacies and have a method of both identifying and withdrawing formal fallacies. It therefore provides a tool for the dialectical evaluation of force of argument when players advance reasons which are deductively incorrect. The system is inspired by Hamblin's formal dialectic and Lorenzen's dialogical logic. It offers uniform protocols for Hamblin's and Lorenzen's dialogues and adds a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The paradigm of dialogue systems has now been under development for over half a century. New models continue to be constructed for the purpose of representing different aspects of human reasoning processes (Kacprzak & Yaskorska, 2014;Visser et al, 2017). Nevertheless, such models have tended to be somewhat schematic and not readily applicable to real-life dialogues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradigm of dialogue systems has now been under development for over half a century. New models continue to be constructed for the purpose of representing different aspects of human reasoning processes (Kacprzak & Yaskorska, 2014;Visser et al, 2017). Nevertheless, such models have tended to be somewhat schematic and not readily applicable to real-life dialogues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach assumes very strict rules of communications, which for example, can prohibit moves representing argumentative mistakes [13,17] or help in validation and verification of some formulas [16,30]. On one hand, the rules make dialogue little trivial, but on the other hand, we can focus on selected dialogue features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%