2020
DOI: 10.7181/acfs.2019.00647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salvage of an exposed cranial prosthetic implant using a transposition flap with an indwelling antibiotic irrigation system

Abstract: Cranial implant removal is recommended if implants become exposed owing to scalp necrosis after cranioplasty. However, it carries the risk of extensive bleeding, and the resultant cranial defects can cause both aesthetic and functional problems. We present a case of a scalp defect exposing a cranial prosthetic implant that was reconstructed with a local flap and salvaged using an indwelling antibiotic irrigation system. A 73-year-old man presented with scalp necrosis after undergoing cranioplasty due to intrac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All 11 patients salvaged their implants and had no recurrence of infection for 2 to 6 years postoperation 9 . Hwang and Chang 15 describe a patient with scalp necrosis and implant exposure postcranioplasty who underwent debridement and a transposition flap followed by an indwelling antibiotic irrigation system for 5 days and IV vancomycin for 4 weeks 15 . The flap survived, and the patient had no reinfection at 4 months postoperatively 15 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All 11 patients salvaged their implants and had no recurrence of infection for 2 to 6 years postoperation 9 . Hwang and Chang 15 describe a patient with scalp necrosis and implant exposure postcranioplasty who underwent debridement and a transposition flap followed by an indwelling antibiotic irrigation system for 5 days and IV vancomycin for 4 weeks 15 . The flap survived, and the patient had no reinfection at 4 months postoperatively 15 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hwang and Chang 15 describe a patient with scalp necrosis and implant exposure postcranioplasty who underwent debridement and a transposition flap followed by an indwelling antibiotic irrigation system for 5 days and IV vancomycin for 4 weeks 15 . The flap survived, and the patient had no reinfection at 4 months postoperatively 15 . In the article by Huang et al, 14 21 patients with implant infection and titanium mesh exposure received U-shaped surgical debridement and either total removal (n = 4), partial removal (n = 3), or retention of titanium implant (n = 14) followed by immediate negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) with chymotrypsin irrigation for 5 days 14 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Antibiotic resistance in bacteria even multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is now a worldwide challenge [ 91 ]. Antibiotic-resistant infections were frequently reported all over the world, including in both developing and developed countries ( Table 4 ) [ 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 ]. During an infection, Staphylococcus aureus ( S. aureus ) often forms biofilms on implantable devices, which dramatically increases the ability of the species to acquire resistance via horizontal plasmid transfer [ 111 ].…”
Section: Clinical Features Of Device-associated Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why S. aureus has high rates of resistance. As shown by the typical cases reported in recent years ( Table 4 ), MRSA has become the most common strain causing infections of various implantable medical devices, including cardiac devices [ 93 , 95 , 99 , 103 , 106 ], orthopedic prosthetics [ 96 , 97 ], cochlear implants [ 98 ], breast implants [ 100 ], laryngeal implants [ 101 ], and stent grafts [ 109 ]. In addition, there is an alarming increase in antibiotic resistance in other strains, such as Acinetobacter baumannii [ 92 ], Mycobacterium chelonae [ 94 ], Enterobacter cloacae complex [ 102 ], S. epidermidis [ 104 , 110 ], Klebsiella pneumoniae [ 105 ], Staphylococcus haemolyticus [ 107 ], and Staphylococcal endophthalmitis [ 108 ], are also involved in various resistant DAIs.…”
Section: Clinical Features Of Device-associated Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%