2001
DOI: 10.2307/1566127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salamander Social Strategies: Living Together in Female-Male Pairs

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is some evidence that P. cinereus follow social monogamy for a mating strategy. Several articles (e.g., Guffey, MaKinster, & Jaeger, 1998;Gillette et al, 2000;Jaeger et al, 2001;Jaeger, Gillette, & Cooper, 2002) support this, noting that males and females exposed to unfamiliar individuals (and their scents) behave more aggressively than when exposed to familiar or partner individuals. Males and females were observed to be more aggressive towards polygamous partners than monogamous partners or strangers (Jaeger et al, 2016).…”
Section: (D) Breeding and Courtshipmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There is some evidence that P. cinereus follow social monogamy for a mating strategy. Several articles (e.g., Guffey, MaKinster, & Jaeger, 1998;Gillette et al, 2000;Jaeger et al, 2001;Jaeger, Gillette, & Cooper, 2002) support this, noting that males and females exposed to unfamiliar individuals (and their scents) behave more aggressively than when exposed to familiar or partner individuals. Males and females were observed to be more aggressive towards polygamous partners than monogamous partners or strangers (Jaeger et al, 2016).…”
Section: (D) Breeding and Courtshipmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To test the hypothesis that males and females would differ in their association preference when choosing simultaneously between a male and a female in the dual choice test (3), we compared the SOP between male and female focal salamanders using a directed t-test (γ = 0.04 and δ = 0.01; Rice and Gaines, 1994) for unequal variances. We used a directed test because prior studies suggest that salamanders prefer to associate with the opposite sex (Peterson et al, 2000;Jaeger et al, 2001;Thaker, Gabor and Fries, 2006). To examine whether males and females exhibited preference for the opposite sex during the dual choice test, we tested if SOP (SOP of 0 indicates no preference) in test 3 was significantly greater than 0 for females (preference for males) and less than 0 for males (preference for females) using one-sample, one-tailed t-tests.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Territoriality or avoidance of conspecifics is not expected when resources are either very limited or very abundant (Carpenter and Macmillen, 1976;reviewed in Maher and Lott, 2000) while aggregation of adult salamanders may occur in situations involving a shared resource such as food, shelter, or mates (Wilson, 1975). The sex of salamanders appears to also influence aggregation patterns as intersexual pairs are more common than intrasexual pairs (Peterson et al, 2000;Jaeger et al, 2001) and females are more likely to aggregate together than are males (Peterson et al, 2000;Verrell and Davis, 2003). In cave ecosystems, resources such as food or mates are typically limited and sparsely distributed (Poulson and White, 1969;Culver, 1982; Barr and Holsinger, 1985), which may result in reduced aggregative tendencies in cave-adapted species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across species and season, the sex of adult salamanders can be an important determinant of aggregation patterns. For example, during the non-breeding season, red-backed salamanders (Plethodon cinereus) tend to aggregate in intersexual pairs more than in intrasexual pairs (Jaeger et al, 2001). During the courtship season, although intersexual pairs of P. cinereus are found more often than intrasexual pairs, the proportion of female pairs is higher than male pairs (Peterson et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Gehlbach, Kimmel and Weems, 1969;Pough and Wilson, 1970;Nussbaum, Brodie and Storm, 1983) and Plethodon spp. (Heatwole, 1960;Wells and Wells, 1976;Jaeger et al, 2001) form aggregations of both sexes during drier conditions because it reduces the rate of desiccation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%