Abstract:Thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser and microkeratome are both safe and effective for the correction of high myopia in Chinese patients. Femtosecond laser shows similar predictability, stability, and induction of higher order aberrations to the microkeratome.
“…Table 4 shows the main outcomes in these studies. 6,7,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19] The visual and refractive outcomes in the studies, including ours, were similar. The small differences between the studies may arise from those at the time of postsurgery examinations, the degree of myopia corrected, or which excimer laser or mechanical microkeratome was used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Although studies have analyzed changes in the short and medium term after LASIK (3 to 36 months), 6,7,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19] to our knowledge, there are no long-term studies of the differences between LASIK flap creation with a femtosecond laser and LASIK flap creation with a microkeratome. The purpose of this randomized study was to assess the differences in visual and optical performance 4 years after LASIK in which the flap was created with 1 of these methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…6,7,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19] Comparative studies of visual acuity between the 2 methods of flap creation found no differences for 1 year 16,17 to 3 years 19 after surgery. Table 4 shows the main outcomes in these studies.…”
The increase in anterior corneal aberrations after myopic LASIK was similar after mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation. Visual acuity, refraction, and the optical quality of the cornea after LASIK remained stable through 4 years postoperatively in both groups.
“…Table 4 shows the main outcomes in these studies. 6,7,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19] The visual and refractive outcomes in the studies, including ours, were similar. The small differences between the studies may arise from those at the time of postsurgery examinations, the degree of myopia corrected, or which excimer laser or mechanical microkeratome was used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Although studies have analyzed changes in the short and medium term after LASIK (3 to 36 months), 6,7,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19] to our knowledge, there are no long-term studies of the differences between LASIK flap creation with a femtosecond laser and LASIK flap creation with a microkeratome. The purpose of this randomized study was to assess the differences in visual and optical performance 4 years after LASIK in which the flap was created with 1 of these methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…6,7,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19] Comparative studies of visual acuity between the 2 methods of flap creation found no differences for 1 year 16,17 to 3 years 19 after surgery. Table 4 shows the main outcomes in these studies.…”
The increase in anterior corneal aberrations after myopic LASIK was similar after mechanical microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation. Visual acuity, refraction, and the optical quality of the cornea after LASIK remained stable through 4 years postoperatively in both groups.
“…These parameters are used for patient selection in regular practice at the study clinic and are similar to parameters used in other recent studies. 10,11 These parameters are also based on the risk factors for keratectasia. 12 Some eyes were not fully corrected to allow monovision treatment, to delay the onset of near vision correction, or because the software did not allow treatment of spherical equivalent more than À10.00 D.…”
Early visual recovery and refractive outcomes after femtosecond lenticule extraction were affected by the scanning trajectory of the laser. A trajectory that scanned from the periphery to the center and the center to the periphery to cut the 2 lenticule surfaces had a positive effect on visual recovery.
“…26 Li et al 27 found that thin-flap LASIK with femtosecond laser and microkeratome was safe and effective for the correction of high myopia in Chinese patients. The safety of the techniques for creating very thin flaps described here should be verified in studies with larger samples.…”
Both techniques were effective, safe, and predictable in eyes with corneas thinner than 470 μm, normal preoperative topography, and a residual corneal bed thickness greater than 250 μm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.