Rotational symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems in a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations

Abstract

Using a mathematical model, we show that a Triple Helix (TH) system contains self-interaction, and therefore self-organization of innovations can be expected in waves, whereas a Double Helix (DH) remains determined by its linear constituents. (The mathematical model is fully elaborated in the Appendices.) The ensuing innovation systems can be expected to have a fractal structure: innovation systems at different scales can be considered as spanned in a Cartesian space with the dimensions of (S)cience, (B)usiness, and (G)overnment. A national system, for example, contains sectorial and regional systems, and is a constituent part in technological and supra-national systems of innovation. The mathematical modeling enables us to clarify the mechanisms, and provides new possibilities for the prediction. Emerging technologies can be expected to be more diversified and their life cycles will become shorter than before. In terms of policy implications, the model suggests a shift from the production of material objects to the production of innovative technologies.

Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation

“…The hybrid triple helix configuration is now a global phenomenon. Its potential to support self-organization in the pursuit of innovation [39] means the model has become so ubiquitous and internationalized even though the institutional structures supporting it remain country-specific [40,41]. Nevertheless, while attempts to adopt the hybrid triple helix model are on the rise, there are no ready-made recipes to help guide countries to develop the capabilities of their institutions and global networks to support their endeavour.…”

Aligning university–industry interactions: The role of boundary spanning in intellectual capital transfer

“…This relationship between university, industry and government is known in the established literature as the 'triple helix', and its effectiveness in knowledge transfer has been favoured, say over a 'double helix' (eg. Ivanova and Leydesdorff, 2014) or in general (eg. Fernandez-Esquinas et al, 2015;Nielsen and Cappelen, 2014).…”

Fostering telecommunication industry development through collaboration among university, industry, and government ~Elevating triple helix model of collaboration in Indonesia~

“…The triple helix represents not only the multiple reciprocal relationships among university, industry, and government, but also the internal transformation within three institutions [7]. These activities create an intersection where the actors can partially substitute and take others' role and/or generate new institutional formats [8,9]. For instance, the university takes a part of the industrial role to creating small innovative companies, industry partially takes university's role to conduct their own research and training centers, and government might become a venture capitalist through some incentive programs [7,8].…”