Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation

Abstract

2015)Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. ISSN 0040-1625 Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/27643We recommend you cite the published version. The publisher's URL is: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.032Refereed: Yes (no note) Disclaimer UWE has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material. UWE makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited.UWE makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights. UWE accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT. Organizing practices of university, industry and government that facilitate (or impede) the transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation Abstract Drawing on the contemporary turn to discursive practices we examine how the organizing practices of industry, university and government facilitate (or impede) developing countries transition to a hybrid triple helix model of innovation. Placing emphasis on the everyday situated practices of institutional agents, their interactions, and collaborative relationships, we identified three domains of practices (advanced research capabilities and external partnerships, the quantification of scientific knowledge and outputs, and collective entrepreneurship) that constitutively facilitate (or impede) partnership and in turn the successful transition to a hybrid triple helix model. Our study also highlights the contextual influence of differential schemata of interpretations on how to organize innovation by the three institutional actors in developing countries.

An Evaluation System for University–Industry Partnership Sustainability: Enhancing Options for Entrepreneurial Universities

“…An analysis of prior research [1][2][3] suggests that the systems available globally have offered no possibilities to execute a multi-variant design and a multiple criteria assessment of alternative iterative life cycles of U-I partnerships, calculate their market and fair value, conduct online negotiations, and select options that offer the best efficiency. Proposing a process-oriented framework that allows overcoming these limitations is the main contribution of this study to theory and practice.…”

“…Analyses of university-industry partnership sustainability (UIPS) have been discussed from different perspectives over the years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. This phenomenon is influenced by different integrated macro-level contexts (e.g., supply and demand, regulations, financing, taxes, culture, tradition, market, climate, political, demographics, and technology).…”

Educación Superior en Alternancia Transfronteriza Entre Francia Y España

“…la interacción de universidades/alumnos, empresas y gobiernos favorece el crecimiento y el empleo en zonas con nuevas visiones estratégicas (Etzkowitz, 2010;Bagherimoghadam et al 2012;ranga & Etzkowitz 2013;Bektas & Tayauova, 2014;Betz et al, 2016;Sarpong et al 2015), en concreto en la literatura académica se ha tratado extensamente el modelo de la TH, que arranca de leydesdorff y Etzkowitz, y se evidencian experiencias de diversos modelos de innovación basados en la TH (Cai & liu 2015;Su & Hung, 2009 (Saad et al, 2008), Brasil (Almeida 2005). Además, en la actual revolución tecnológica, a través de los contratos Universidad-Empresa se activa un efectivo mecanismo como nexo necesario entre la universidad y el sector productivo, para la generación del desarrollo científico-técnico y económico (Castillo & reyes, 2015).…”

“…2. En las cuatro experiencias se evidencia una mayor empleabilidad con la educación en alternancia en sintonía con la competitividad que identifica el modelo de la TH (Etzkowitz, 2010;Bagherimoghadam et al 2012;ranga y Etzkowitz 2013;Bektas, 2014;Betz et al, 2015;Sarpong et al 2015). 3.…”

The Retreat of Public Research and Its Adverse Consequences on Innovation

“…These trends show a clear structural change: the business sector is becoming more and more important in knowledge creation, while the public sector is slowly retracting (on this trend see also Conceicao et al, 2004;Dinges et al, 2007;Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie, 2008). Most of the attention of science and innovation policy in the last decades has been directed towards the relevance of the interconnections between universities, industry and the governments (as in the Triple Helix view) (Colombo et al, 2011;Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff, 2000;Lawton Smith and Bagchi-Sen, 2010;Sarpong et al, 2015), and the major institutional transformations that have followed in the production of knowledge (exemplified in the Mode 2 knowledge production) (Gibbons et al, 1994). University-industry linkages have become imperative and ubiquitous in the political agenda as a means to boost technology transfer and for improving training in skills required by the industry Gander, 1986;Hsu et al, 2015;Perkmann et al, 2013).…”