2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2010.00556.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Romifidine as a constant rate infusion in isoflurane anaesthetized horses: a clinical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
3
8

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
27
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast with the results of Kuhn et al. (2004), a CRI of the same α 2 ‐agonist (romifidine 40 μg kg −1 hour −1 ) did not affect cardiovascular function (including CI), isoflurane requirement or recovery quality in isoflurane anaesthetized horses undergoing elective surgery (Devisscher et al. 2010).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…In contrast with the results of Kuhn et al. (2004), a CRI of the same α 2 ‐agonist (romifidine 40 μg kg −1 hour −1 ) did not affect cardiovascular function (including CI), isoflurane requirement or recovery quality in isoflurane anaesthetized horses undergoing elective surgery (Devisscher et al. 2010).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…35 Indeed, the analgesic and sedative efficacy of romifidine 24,36,37 could have contributed to both the hemodynamic stability and better recoveries. 40 In equine patients, maintenance of adequate cardiovascular variables is extremely important because decreased peripheral perfusion can lead to myopathies caused by reduced muscular blood flow. McMurphy et al 12 observed that horses receiving TIVA had higher blood pressures than did those in which anesthesia was maintained with halothane.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of extreme importance in horses with infusions of α 2 ‐agonists, in which a “lighter” appearance, compared with traditional inhalant protocols, is common (Kalchofner et al., ). No isoflurane concentration reductions were demonstrated after romifidine (Devisscher, Schauvliege, Dewulf, & Gasthuys, ), detomidine (Schauvliege et al., ) and dexmedetomidine (Marcilla et al., ). The same happened in the comparison between medetomidine and dexmedetomidine (Sacks et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%