Oxford Bibliographies Online Datasets 2018
DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780199743292-0226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Role Theory in International Relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“… A similar interactionist perspective can be found in recent work on role theory in international relations and other research that has made strong claims about the co‐constitutive nature of structural and institutional constraints and the characteristics of agents (e.g., Barnett & Duvall, ; Bueno de Mesquita, Smith, Siverson, & Morrow, ; Carlsnaes, ; Chiozza & Goemans, ; Giddens, ; Shannon & Kowert, ; Thies, ). Studies on national role conceptions, for example, see egos interacting with others and with normative structures to identify appropriate patterns of behavior (e.g., Harnisch, Frank, & Maull, ; McCourt, ). Strong empirical evidence, however, about how the co‐constitution between agent and structure influence the decision‐making process or the outcome, however, has been lacking (e.g., Barnett & Duvall, ; Dessler, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… A similar interactionist perspective can be found in recent work on role theory in international relations and other research that has made strong claims about the co‐constitutive nature of structural and institutional constraints and the characteristics of agents (e.g., Barnett & Duvall, ; Bueno de Mesquita, Smith, Siverson, & Morrow, ; Carlsnaes, ; Chiozza & Goemans, ; Giddens, ; Shannon & Kowert, ; Thies, ). Studies on national role conceptions, for example, see egos interacting with others and with normative structures to identify appropriate patterns of behavior (e.g., Harnisch, Frank, & Maull, ; McCourt, ). Strong empirical evidence, however, about how the co‐constitution between agent and structure influence the decision‐making process or the outcome, however, has been lacking (e.g., Barnett & Duvall, ; Dessler, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dialogic and relational theorisation of identity overlaps with the approach taken by another popular IR theoryrole theory (Holsti 1970, Harnisch et al 2011. It stresses the importance of mutual perceptions between the Self and Other in external relations.…”
Section: Connecting Strategic Narrative To Perceptions Researchmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It stresses the importance of mutual perceptions between the Self and Other in external relations. It takes an actor's role conceptions (its perceptions of appropriate behaviour, given a certain context) but also role prescriptions (its expectations of external actors) (Harnisch et al 2011). And while the consideration of mutuality is groundbreaking, the theory seems to overlook the longitudinal aspect in the role prescriptions and conceptions.…”
Section: Connecting Strategic Narrative To Perceptions Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various states perceive human rights norms as 'universal' or 'unalienable' principles that form the backbone of their constitutional laws. Role theory describes how such national identities may affect social interactions in international relations (Harnisch et al, 2011). Hence, it is plausible that human rights norms, as key elements of state identities, affect the social interactions of states.…”
Section: 'Human Rights Cultures' In Igosmentioning
confidence: 99%